Is Adalia a boy or girl name?
Adalia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 131 girls and 0 boys were named Adalia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,378 US babies named Adalia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,592
- Babies named Adalia since 1895
- 2,378
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 131 babies
Boys and girls named Adalia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1920s | 0 | 14 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 14 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 34 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 44 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 60 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 148 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 508 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 955 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 551 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,592 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,708 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,817 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,860 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,217 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,933 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,274 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,128 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,221 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,851 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,026 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,900 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,802 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 89 | #2,142 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 82 | #2,313 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,893 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,925 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 57 | #3,048 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,396 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,787 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,851 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,472 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,462 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,322 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,080 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,576 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,797 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,485 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,308 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,440 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,593 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,564 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,718 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 7 | #10,275 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,250 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,685 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,247 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,790 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,919 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,050 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,472 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,325 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,097 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,696 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,652 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,289 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,984 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,437 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,296 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,999 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,976 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,008 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,896 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,293 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,696 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,105 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,831 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,717 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,553 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,714 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,673 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,430 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,452 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,350 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,011 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,592 |
Highest rank
Adalia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,592 in 1895. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Adalia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.