Is Ansley a boy or girl name?
Ansley is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 174 girls and 0 boys were named Ansley, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 97.6% of the 11,995 US babies named Ansley were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,314
- Babies named Ansley since 1913
- 11,995
- Most popular year
- 2011
- 477 babies
Boys and girls named Ansley, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 30 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 16 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 5 | 66 | 93% |
| 1970s | 24 | 206 | 89.6% |
| 1980s | 40 | 557 | 93.3% |
| 1990s | 27 | 1,769 | 98.5% |
| 2000s | 54 | 3,891 | 98.6% |
| 2010s | 42 | 4,078 | 99% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,138 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 174 | #1,314 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,151 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 229 | #1,089 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 256 | #999 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 268 | #952 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 273 | #963 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 347 | #786 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 362 | #764 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 412 | #698 |
| 2015 | 6 | #10,748 | 467 | #618 |
| 2014 | 6 | #10,798 | 464 | #617 |
| 2013 | 6 | #10,817 | 417 | #679 |
| 2012 | 8 | #8,913 | 404 | #696 |
| 2011 | 7 | #9,670 | 470 | #616 |
| 2010 | 9 | #8,185 | 462 | #636 |
| 2009 | 6 | #11,087 | 449 | #659 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 414 | #719 |
| 2007 | 7 | #9,841 | 414 | #706 |
| 2006 | 7 | #9,641 | 404 | #706 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 421 | #657 |
| 2004 | 6 | #10,027 | 412 | #663 |
| 2003 | 6 | #9,645 | 383 | #685 |
| 2002 | 5 | #10,779 | 370 | #680 |
| 2001 | 8 | #7,565 | 324 | #739 |
| 2000 | 9 | #6,877 | 300 | #762 |
| 1999 | 5 | #10,004 | 263 | #824 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 289 | #750 |
| 1997 | 6 | #8,183 | 234 | #872 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 201 | #958 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,074 |
| 1994 | 5 | #8,853 | 166 | #1,083 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,290 |
| 1992 | 5 | #8,500 | 112 | #1,435 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,465 |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,223 | 99 | #1,544 |
| 1989 | 8 | #5,650 | 98 | #1,481 |
| 1988 | 6 | #6,466 | 75 | #1,705 |
| 1987 | 5 | #7,019 | 74 | #1,648 |
| 1986 | 6 | #5,967 | 45 | #2,266 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,948 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,303 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,361 |
| 1982 | 7 | #5,041 | 41 | #2,372 |
| 1981 | 8 | #4,531 | 46 | #2,198 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,392 |
| 1979 | 5 | #6,102 | 29 | #2,933 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,867 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,718 |
| 1976 | 5 | #5,629 | 14 | #4,370 |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,502 | 21 | #3,271 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,928 |
| 1973 | 9 | #3,459 | 22 | #3,023 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,124 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,546 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,721 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,068 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,503 |
| 1967 | 5 | #3,992 | 10 | #4,310 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,885 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,963 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,317 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,873 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,415 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 6 | #3,438 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 5 | #3,732 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 5 | #3,747 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,449 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 6 | #3,151 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 5 | #3,545 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,290 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,021 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 5 | #4,177 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 7 | #3,403 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 8 | #3,165 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,264 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,752 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,205 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 8 | #2,965 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,529 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 5 | #2,835 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ansley reached #2,835 in 1913. As a girl name, it reached #616 in 2011. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ansley
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.