Is Camilo a boy or girl name?
Camilo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 565 boys were named Camilo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 8,552 US babies named Camilo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #526
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Camilo since 1909
- 8,552
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 682 babies
Boys and girls named Camilo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 75 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 164 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 134 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 141 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 170 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 199 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 297 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 504 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 687 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,410 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 2,179 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,587 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 565 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 628 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 682 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 454 | #614 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 258 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 256 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 216 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 224 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 206 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 217 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 217 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 196 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 258 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 194 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 195 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 229 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 157 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 157 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 159 | #1,102 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 150 | #1,099 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 158 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 114 | #1,261 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 97 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 110 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 79 | #1,516 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 73 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 76 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 71 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 74 | #1,414 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 63 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 60 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 64 | #1,462 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 70 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 52 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 84 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 62 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 53 | #1,452 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 57 | #1,298 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 50 | #1,403 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 56 | #1,284 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 60 | #1,178 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 46 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 40 | #1,543 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 34 | #1,696 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 46 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 27 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 28 | #1,836 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 37 | #1,516 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 35 | #1,542 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,895 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 37 | #1,413 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 25 | #1,784 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 22 | #1,935 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 33 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 28 | #1,622 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 18 | #1,988 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 24 | #1,616 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 26 | #1,510 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 13 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 17 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 22 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 13 | #2,315 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 15 | #2,125 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 19 | #1,883 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 32 | #1,405 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 14 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 14 | #2,197 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 20 | #1,766 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,154 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 14 | #2,124 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 23 | #1,598 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 19 | #1,754 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 11 | #2,387 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 19 | #1,705 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 14 | #2,037 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 19 | #1,710 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 19 | #1,742 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 13 | #2,045 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 9 | #2,417 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 11 | #2,209 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 18 | #1,705 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 16 | #1,808 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 9 | #2,510 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 13 | #1,995 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,866 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 11 | #2,220 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 14 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 16 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 10 | #2,414 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 10 | #2,393 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 13 | #2,112 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 24 | #1,499 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 17 | #1,856 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 18 | #1,837 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 19 | #1,809 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 14 | #2,212 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,687 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 16 | #2,056 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 10 | #2,791 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 17 | #1,964 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 21 | #1,712 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 11 | #2,628 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 12 | #2,400 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 20 | #1,720 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,002 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 15 | #1,967 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 13 | #2,085 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,487 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Camilo reached #451 in 2022. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Camilo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.