Is Cecilio a boy or girl name?
Cecilio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 15 boys were named Cecilio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,402 US babies named Cecilio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,935
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Cecilio since 1909
- 2,402
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 39 babies
Boys and girls named Cecilio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 126 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 198 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 221 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 239 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 311 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 322 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 220 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 148 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 81 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15 | #5,935 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 19 | #5,101 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 12 | #6,896 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 18 | #5,147 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 17 | #5,283 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 12 | #6,847 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 8 | #8,966 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 13 | #6,380 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 22 | #4,498 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 13 | #6,390 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 18 | #5,096 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 12 | #6,668 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 15 | #5,760 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,013 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 17 | #5,286 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 16 | #5,600 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 20 | #4,741 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 28 | #3,703 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 14 | #5,831 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 17 | #4,855 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 14 | #5,541 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 24 | #3,642 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 27 | #3,276 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 35 | #2,692 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 25 | #3,318 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 30 | #2,805 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 39 | #2,280 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 35 | #2,354 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 27 | #2,761 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 33 | #2,358 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 30 | #2,514 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 37 | #2,129 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 28 | #2,544 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 30 | #2,351 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 33 | #2,177 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 28 | #2,367 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 29 | #2,149 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 25 | #2,279 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 25 | #2,232 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 33 | #1,800 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 27 | #1,986 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 35 | #1,658 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 38 | #1,601 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 37 | #1,607 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 34 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 29 | #1,802 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 36 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 23 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 24 | #1,892 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 21 | #1,992 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 31 | #1,540 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 15 | #2,476 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 30 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 29 | #1,499 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 26 | #1,550 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 30 | #1,388 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 21 | #1,688 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,866 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 30 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 26 | #1,548 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 25 | #1,592 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 14 | #2,248 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 20 | #1,820 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 22 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 23 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 19 | #1,842 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 20 | #1,768 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 27 | #1,490 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 20 | #1,714 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 19 | #1,773 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 24 | #1,551 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 25 | #1,491 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 22 | #1,576 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 18 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 17 | #1,828 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 24 | #1,522 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 23 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 24 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 21 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 15 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,426 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 17 | #1,696 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 15 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,648 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,207 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 16 | #1,766 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 11 | #2,200 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 13 | #2,044 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 10 | #2,416 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 11 | #2,234 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,429 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 13 | #2,114 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 18 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 15 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 14 | #2,179 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 19 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 16 | #1,994 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 20 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 20 | #1,787 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 16 | #2,036 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 15 | #2,156 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 21 | #1,713 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 24 | #1,549 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 10 | #2,703 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,573 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 16 | #1,916 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 9 | #2,757 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 13 | #2,088 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 9 | #2,304 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 11 | #1,694 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,611 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,489 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Cecilio reached #1,351 in 1945. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Cecilio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.