Is Chadwick a boy or girl name?
Chadwick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 24 boys were named Chadwick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 13,272 US babies named Chadwick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,325
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Chadwick since 1914
- 13,272
- Most popular year
- 1975
- 714 babies
Boys and girls named Chadwick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 101 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 61 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 112 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 143 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 852 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 5,711 | 17 | 0.3% |
| 1980s | 3,438 | 5 | 0.1% |
| 1990s | 1,661 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 636 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 309 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | #4,325 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 34 | #3,427 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 51 | #2,621 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 41 | #2,983 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 30 | #3,586 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 20 | #4,829 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 39 | #3,002 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 28 | #3,789 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 18 | #5,169 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 39 | #2,975 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 32 | #3,385 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 32 | #3,347 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 34 | #3,240 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 34 | #3,249 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 33 | #3,318 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 47 | #2,627 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 44 | #2,755 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 46 | #2,647 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 51 | #2,411 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 57 | #2,133 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 75 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 77 | #1,631 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 78 | #1,573 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 82 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 79 | #1,517 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 101 | #1,235 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 97 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 124 | #1,029 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 127 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 157 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 142 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 174 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 213 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 244 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 282 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 328 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 336 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 383 | #454 | 5 | #11,582 |
| 1986 | 303 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 282 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 309 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 309 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 371 | #435 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 392 | #420 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 425 | #395 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 551 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 519 | #338 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 586 | #318 | 5 | #9,844 |
| 1976 | 619 | #297 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 707 | #272 | 7 | #7,270 |
| 1974 | 609 | #303 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 565 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 619 | #301 | 5 | #8,459 |
| 1971 | 566 | #329 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 370 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 250 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 182 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 143 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 98 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 61 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 37 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 34 | #1,339 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,812 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 16 | #2,075 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 11 | #2,557 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 11 | #2,555 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 15 | #2,111 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 14 | #2,200 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 16 | #2,026 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 25 | #1,545 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 14 | #2,127 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 8 | #2,942 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 12 | #2,267 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 12 | #2,269 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 16 | #1,891 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 12 | #2,243 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 19 | #1,713 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 17 | #1,861 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 21 | #1,564 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,784 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 8 | #2,667 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 13 | #2,089 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,273 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 9 | #2,512 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,872 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 8 | #2,680 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 10 | #2,349 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 6 | #3,318 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 9 | #2,578 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,432 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 8 | #2,898 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 7 | #3,332 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 10 | #2,626 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 15 | #2,061 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 12 | #2,428 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 9 | #2,949 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 9 | #2,967 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,061 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 12 | #2,471 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 13 | #2,399 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 12 | #2,479 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 9 | #2,912 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 8 | #3,150 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 9 | #2,770 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,007 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 9 | #2,662 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 6 | #2,972 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Chadwick reached #272 in 1975. As a girl name, it reached #7,270 in 1975. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Chadwick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.