Is Ciro a boy or girl name?
Ciro is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 58 boys were named Ciro, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,542 US babies named Ciro were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,394
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ciro since 1907
- 2,542
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 58 babies
Boys and girls named Ciro, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 102 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 227 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 184 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 207 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 214 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 220 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 202 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 247 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 305 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 230 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 218 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 58 | #2,394 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 38 | #3,183 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 57 | #2,441 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 33 | #3,435 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 32 | #3,430 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 34 | #3,362 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 20 | #4,775 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 23 | #4,349 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 21 | #4,647 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 24 | #4,196 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 24 | #4,160 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 19 | #4,830 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 22 | #4,416 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 15 | #5,715 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 28 | #3,729 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 24 | #4,183 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 36 | #3,170 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 32 | #3,390 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 25 | #3,911 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 34 | #3,029 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 32 | #3,091 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 25 | #3,547 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 26 | #3,368 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 36 | #2,629 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 35 | #2,631 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 20 | #3,720 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 17 | #4,048 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 23 | #3,177 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 17 | #3,848 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 24 | #2,933 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 32 | #2,401 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 18 | #3,526 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 35 | #2,184 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 34 | #2,149 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 27 | #2,499 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 16 | #3,483 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 22 | #2,620 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 22 | #2,486 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 26 | #2,174 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 18 | #2,734 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 19 | #2,545 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 16 | #2,810 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 16 | #2,859 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 26 | #2,046 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 21 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 19 | #2,481 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 22 | #2,141 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,014 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 19 | #2,348 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 18 | #2,381 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 28 | #1,700 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 28 | #1,661 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 20 | #2,027 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 23 | #1,873 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 19 | #2,073 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 19 | #1,919 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 31 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 14 | #2,159 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 19 | #1,761 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 23 | #1,631 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 25 | #1,586 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 13 | #2,321 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 20 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 23 | #1,695 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 27 | #1,557 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 23 | #1,672 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 21 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 17 | #1,964 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 19 | #1,839 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 26 | #1,509 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 22 | #1,635 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 21 | #1,680 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 18 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 22 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,755 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 11 | #2,357 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 21 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 16 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 22 | #1,520 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 24 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 14 | #1,901 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 19 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 19 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 21 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 17 | #1,691 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 11 | #2,186 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 21 | #1,484 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 9 | #2,519 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 14 | #1,884 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 24 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 21 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 18 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 22 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 20 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,650 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 27 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 26 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 20 | #1,753 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 19 | #1,798 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,691 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 22 | #1,682 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 30 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 21 | #1,704 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 20 | #1,777 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 21 | #1,706 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 13 | #2,283 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 14 | #2,178 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 9 | #2,771 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 18 | #1,708 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 20 | #1,567 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 10 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 7 | #2,309 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 11 | #1,542 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ciro reached #1,222 in 1907. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.