Is Cordell a boy or girl name?
Cordell is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 69 boys were named Cordell, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.4% of the 10,908 US babies named Cordell were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,132
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Cordell since 1903
- 10,908
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 387 babies
Boys and girls named Cordell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 19 | 6 | 24% |
| 1910s | 167 | 53 | 24.1% |
| 1920s | 263 | 46 | 14.9% |
| 1930s | 366 | 25 | 6.4% |
| 1940s | 579 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 560 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 701 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 838 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,317 | 18 | 1.3% |
| 1990s | 2,423 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,961 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,150 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 416 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 69 | #2,132 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 88 | #1,816 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 87 | #1,841 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 82 | #1,871 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 90 | #1,718 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 78 | #1,902 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 87 | #1,763 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 125 | #1,405 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 114 | #1,491 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 129 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 119 | #1,416 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 124 | #1,362 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 109 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 127 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 138 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 195 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 279 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 165 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 137 | #1,224 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 127 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 167 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 173 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 189 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 244 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 285 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 343 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 387 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 318 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 302 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 267 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 216 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 110 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 133 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 163 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 184 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 167 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 249 | #588 | 5 | #12,201 |
| 1987 | 257 | #563 | 5 | #11,667 |
| 1986 | 215 | #608 | 8 | #7,902 |
| 1985 | 63 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 59 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 68 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 68 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 89 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 82 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 85 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 87 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 82 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 80 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 108 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 91 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 83 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 57 | #1,071 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 81 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 84 | #882 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 88 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 71 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 68 | #868 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 71 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 90 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 77 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 60 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 69 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 63 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 44 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 50 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 42 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 58 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 50 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 85 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 55 | #1,009 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 49 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 63 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 56 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 52 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 55 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 52 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 45 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 52 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 54 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 66 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 55 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 57 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 68 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 75 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 57 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 50 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 31 | #1,187 | 5 | #4,376 |
| 1936 | 36 | #1,073 | 5 | #4,314 |
| 1935 | 19 | #1,599 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 36 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 49 | #888 | 5 | #4,342 |
| 1932 | 28 | #1,293 | 5 | #4,539 |
| 1931 | 28 | #1,310 | 5 | #4,448 |
| 1930 | 32 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 18 | #1,807 | 7 | #3,745 |
| 1928 | 13 | #2,290 | 8 | #3,487 |
| 1927 | 33 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 25 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,695 | 5 | #5,121 |
| 1924 | 21 | #1,734 | 5 | #5,227 |
| 1923 | 28 | #1,389 | 7 | #4,055 |
| 1922 | 36 | #1,200 | 14 | #2,514 |
| 1921 | 31 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 37 | #1,186 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 36 | #1,169 | 6 | #4,357 |
| 1918 | 20 | #1,726 | 13 | #2,553 |
| 1917 | 27 | #1,333 | 13 | #2,448 |
| 1916 | 26 | #1,345 | 6 | #4,017 |
| 1915 | 16 | #1,804 | 8 | #3,190 |
| 1914 | 20 | #1,352 | 7 | #2,956 |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 10 | #1,646 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,178 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,244 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,640 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Cordell reached #531 in 1998. As a girl name, it reached #1,640 in 1903. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Cordell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.