Is Cosmo a boy or girl name?
Cosmo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 99 boys were named Cosmo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 2,875 US babies named Cosmo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,683
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Cosmo since 1910
- 2,875
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 105 babies
Boys and girls named Cosmo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 254 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 452 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 286 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 191 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 191 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 128 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 108 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 172 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 254 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 282 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 430 | 6 | 1.4% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 94 | #1,746 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 99 | #1,708 | 6 | #13,973 |
| 2021 | 78 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 60 | #2,268 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 49 | #2,631 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 41 | #2,903 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 42 | #2,848 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 21 | #4,651 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 32 | #3,443 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 14 | #6,053 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 20 | #4,649 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 16 | #5,522 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 22 | #4,392 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 25 | #4,013 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 18 | #5,138 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 22 | #4,423 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 19 | #4,843 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 33 | #3,233 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 41 | #2,670 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 26 | #3,548 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 22 | #3,863 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 29 | #3,122 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 22 | #3,736 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 22 | #3,658 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 18 | #4,009 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,729 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,478 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 20 | #3,423 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 16 | #3,893 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 27 | #2,700 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 15 | #4,055 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 14 | #4,141 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 11 | #4,821 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 12 | #4,452 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 13 | #4,067 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,286 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 6 | #6,256 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,687 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 11 | #3,844 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 11 | #3,747 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,446 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 17 | #2,729 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 12 | #3,457 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 6 | #5,661 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 16 | #2,798 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 8 | #4,229 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 6 | #5,247 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 8 | #4,076 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 10 | #3,487 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 15 | #2,578 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 14 | #2,625 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 17 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 14 | #2,586 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 20 | #2,009 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 11 | #2,723 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 6 | #3,766 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,501 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 13 | #2,241 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 8 | #3,030 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 13 | #2,328 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 16 | #2,056 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 13 | #2,297 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 13 | #2,340 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 17 | #1,979 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 14 | #2,217 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 16 | #2,039 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 19 | #1,844 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 28 | #1,487 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 15 | #2,067 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 17 | #1,905 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 24 | #1,557 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 20 | #1,714 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 22 | #1,606 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 16 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 18 | #1,770 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 20 | #1,663 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 22 | #1,611 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 14 | #1,968 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 8 | #2,605 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 13 | #2,010 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 25 | #1,408 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 31 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 29 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 11 | #2,210 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 26 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 25 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 26 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 25 | #1,331 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 26 | #1,333 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 21 | #1,517 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 32 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 35 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 31 | #1,240 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 39 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 35 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 43 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 45 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 50 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 50 | #959 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 48 | #1,020 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 47 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 40 | #1,122 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 54 | #954 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 40 | #1,123 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 42 | #1,050 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 43 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 35 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 28 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 31 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 23 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 28 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 11 | #1,547 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 7 | #1,417 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Cosmo reached #933 in 1913. As a girl name, it reached #13,973 in 2022. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.