Is Cristobal a boy or girl name?
Cristobal is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 122 boys were named Cristobal, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 7,896 US babies named Cristobal were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,480
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Cristobal since 1908
- 7,896
- Most popular year
- 2001
- 249 babies
Boys and girls named Cristobal, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 63 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 168 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 150 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 235 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 341 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 649 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 901 | 11 | 1.2% |
| 1990s | 1,349 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,858 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,385 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 626 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 122 | #1,480 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 133 | #1,391 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 125 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 133 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 113 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 119 | #1,462 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 127 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 102 | #1,583 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 145 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 164 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 143 | #1,252 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 135 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 152 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 151 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 147 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 181 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 160 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 215 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 183 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 175 | #988 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 162 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 176 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 159 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 249 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 198 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 146 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 129 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 148 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 136 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 147 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 144 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 141 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 115 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 118 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 125 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 107 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 80 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 87 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 82 | #1,023 | 6 | #9,800 |
| 1985 | 83 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 84 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 96 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 104 | #872 | 5 | #10,833 |
| 1981 | 96 | #916 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 82 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 86 | #956 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 73 | #1,016 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 74 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 60 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 74 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 64 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 63 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 63 | #1,015 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 46 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 46 | #1,225 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 53 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 42 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 29 | #1,417 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 31 | #1,377 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 36 | #1,279 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 29 | #1,467 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 32 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 35 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 30 | #1,468 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 24 | #1,665 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 37 | #1,280 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 29 | #1,451 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 23 | #1,682 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 24 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,160 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 17 | #1,906 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 23 | #1,599 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 30 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 21 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 17 | #1,831 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 16 | #1,880 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 20 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 19 | #1,746 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 11 | #2,298 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 15 | #1,795 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 18 | #1,642 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 19 | #1,649 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 12 | #2,171 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 9 | #2,516 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 13 | #2,006 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 13 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 12 | #2,103 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,723 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 14 | #1,893 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 18 | #1,671 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 10 | #2,431 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 23 | #1,474 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 19 | #1,651 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,655 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 15 | #2,021 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 14 | #2,184 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 18 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 10 | #2,763 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 26 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 20 | #1,790 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 17 | #1,960 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 19 | #1,838 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 22 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,557 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,172 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 8 | #3,165 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,639 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,588 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 16 | #1,805 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,355 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,341 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 8 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Cristobal reached #708 in 2001. As a girl name, it reached #9,800 in 1986. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Cristobal
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.