Is Damian a boy or girl name?
Damian is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 3,233 boys were named Damian, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 107,019 US babies named Damian were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #110
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Damian since 1912
- 107,019
- Most popular year
- 2013
- 3,985 babies
Boys and girls named Damian, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 45 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 91 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 126 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 231 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 700 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,865 | 14 | 0.7% |
| 1970s | 7,283 | 142 | 1.9% |
| 1980s | 5,721 | 44 | 0.8% |
| 1990s | 12,687 | 62 | 0.5% |
| 2000s | 26,033 | 29 | 0.1% |
| 2010s | 35,277 | 45 | 0.1% |
| 2020s | 16,624 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,233 | #110 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 3,291 | #108 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 3,464 | #107 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 3,299 | #113 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 3,337 | #110 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 3,452 | #112 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 3,551 | #109 | 7 | #12,792 |
| 2017 | 3,344 | #119 | 6 | #14,555 |
| 2016 | 3,346 | #123 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 3,491 | #116 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 3,880 | #102 | 6 | #15,021 |
| 2013 | 3,974 | #98 | 11 | #9,754 |
| 2012 | 3,860 | #99 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 3,013 | #138 | 8 | #12,438 |
| 2010 | 3,366 | #121 | 7 | #13,810 |
| 2009 | 3,349 | #127 | 5 | #17,967 |
| 2008 | 3,077 | #133 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 2,989 | #137 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 2,977 | #137 | 6 | #15,582 |
| 2005 | 2,630 | #156 | 5 | #17,109 |
| 2004 | 2,529 | #160 | 8 | #11,862 |
| 2003 | 2,454 | #163 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 2,345 | #163 | 5 | #16,024 |
| 2001 | 1,963 | #189 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 1,720 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 1,540 | #220 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 1,567 | #207 | 9 | #9,457 |
| 1997 | 1,507 | #206 | 6 | #12,441 |
| 1996 | 1,408 | #214 | 5 | #14,020 |
| 1995 | 1,350 | #221 | 7 | #10,777 |
| 1994 | 1,349 | #215 | 9 | #8,997 |
| 1993 | 1,133 | #252 | 6 | #12,130 |
| 1992 | 1,087 | #261 | 6 | #12,111 |
| 1991 | 964 | #277 | 6 | #11,846 |
| 1990 | 782 | #322 | 8 | #9,463 |
| 1989 | 777 | #307 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 620 | #342 | 6 | #10,663 |
| 1987 | 537 | #365 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 514 | #363 | 7 | #8,739 |
| 1985 | 507 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 540 | #346 | 8 | #7,535 |
| 1983 | 542 | #339 | 8 | #7,446 |
| 1982 | 583 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 517 | #347 | 5 | #10,764 |
| 1980 | 584 | #325 | 10 | #6,398 |
| 1979 | 678 | #296 | 16 | #4,455 |
| 1978 | 847 | #244 | 7 | #7,786 |
| 1977 | 1,054 | #210 | 15 | #4,475 |
| 1976 | 993 | #213 | 12 | #4,949 |
| 1975 | 891 | #231 | 21 | #3,295 |
| 1974 | 829 | #241 | 22 | #3,131 |
| 1973 | 658 | #278 | 18 | #3,512 |
| 1972 | 623 | #298 | 14 | #4,128 |
| 1971 | 371 | #417 | 9 | #5,626 |
| 1970 | 339 | #446 | 8 | #5,927 |
| 1969 | 282 | #456 | 9 | #5,124 |
| 1968 | 286 | #453 | 5 | #7,219 |
| 1967 | 173 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 171 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 162 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 183 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 170 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 163 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 143 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 132 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 103 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 81 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 87 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 88 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 88 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 68 | #895 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 53 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 57 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 38 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 37 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 40 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 32 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 24 | #1,525 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 18 | #1,706 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 28 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 14 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 25 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 16 | #1,814 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 17 | #1,705 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 17 | #1,693 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 16 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 17 | #1,700 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 13 | #2,016 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 10 | #2,324 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 9 | #2,575 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 9 | #2,602 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,016 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 17 | #1,790 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 11 | #2,353 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,478 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,644 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 7 | #3,429 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,527 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,195 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 14 | #2,215 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 10 | #2,854 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 9 | #2,994 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 14 | #2,265 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 8 | #3,272 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 8 | #3,272 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 7 | #3,446 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 10 | #2,592 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 7 | #3,155 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,714 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,132 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,342 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Damian reached #98 in 2013. As a girl name, it reached #3,131 in 1974. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Damian
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.