Is Darleen a boy or girl name?
Darleen was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 8,322 US babies named Darleen were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #10,446
- Babies named Darleen since 1914
- 8,322
- Most popular year
- 1958
- 231 babies
Boys and girls named Darleen, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 811 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,181 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,842 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,667 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,318 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 504 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 227 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 176 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 219 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 232 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,446 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,421 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,650 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,736 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,075 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,192 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,315 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,643 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,480 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,723 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,399 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,130 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,865 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,414 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,464 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,751 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,476 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,384 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,189 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,606 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,861 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,374 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,953 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,875 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,688 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,948 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,798 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,946 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,815 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,380 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,276 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,025 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,568 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,728 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,274 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,909 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,922 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,770 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,386 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,438 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,536 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,724 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,782 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,939 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,029 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,119 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,754 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,265 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,494 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,144 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,713 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,627 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,657 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,395 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,371 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,141 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,179 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 114 | #952 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 120 | #922 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 132 | #871 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 146 | #860 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 132 | #915 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 158 | #838 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 185 | #771 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 152 | #838 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 185 | #748 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 231 | #651 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 193 | #719 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 167 | #753 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 151 | #784 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 122 | #860 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 146 | #756 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 139 | #755 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 162 | #686 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 171 | #653 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 200 | #585 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 193 | #602 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 208 | #590 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 209 | #547 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 169 | #565 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 158 | #582 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 227 | #494 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 166 | #572 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 177 | #524 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 135 | #598 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 150 | #546 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 155 | #548 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 119 | #621 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 112 | #623 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 99 | #669 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 96 | #680 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 110 | #620 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 109 | #640 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 107 | #644 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 124 | #623 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 112 | #657 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 120 | #642 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 125 | #645 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 91 | #758 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 102 | #729 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 71 | #894 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 59 | #968 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 65 | #909 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,261 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,559 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,092 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,419 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,015 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,049 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,510 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,281 |
Highest rank
Darleen has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #494 in 1943. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Darleen
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.