Is Delila a boy or girl name?
Delila is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 45 girls and 0 boys were named Delila, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,523 US babies named Delila were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,452
- Babies named Delila since 1880
- 3,523
- Most popular year
- 2008
- 118 babies
Boys and girls named Delila, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 56 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 84 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 158 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 214 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 210 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 227 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 181 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 122 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 191 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 282 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 237 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 636 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 634 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 224 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,452 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,230 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,043 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,037 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,743 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,182 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,519 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,574 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,022 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,687 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,196 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,193 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,502 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 82 | #2,279 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,262 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,938 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 118 | #1,828 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 85 | #2,278 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,820 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,136 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,754 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,373 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,613 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,043 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,180 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,199 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,679 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,839 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,630 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,382 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,785 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,704 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,152 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,094 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,929 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,420 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,723 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,044 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,475 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,445 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,743 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,077 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,281 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,039 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,188 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,361 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,309 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,401 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,305 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,407 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,082 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,042 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,083 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,682 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,331 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,787 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,856 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,197 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,069 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,266 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,735 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,854 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,831 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,085 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,115 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,715 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,885 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,956 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,164 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,570 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,803 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,185 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,600 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,029 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,690 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,927 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,432 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,211 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,874 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,889 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,043 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,960 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,270 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,543 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,980 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,630 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,623 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,744 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,965 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,560 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,566 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,480 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,351 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,759 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,375 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,564 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,645 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,530 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,313 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,759 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,617 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,717 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,615 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,063 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,964 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,095 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,125 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,727 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,751 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,817 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,675 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,696 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,433 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,689 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,354 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,501 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,190 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,415 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,449 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,326 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,954 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,475 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,852 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,249 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,302 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,402 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 11 | #994 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,321 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #944 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,202 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 10 | #973 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,236 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 17 | #644 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 13 | #638 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 7 | #915 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 11 | #664 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 7 | #763 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #836 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #693 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 5 | #853 |
Highest rank
Delila has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #638 in 1887. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Delila
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.