Is Drucilla a boy or girl name?
Drucilla was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,572 US babies named Drucilla were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #15,876
- Babies named Drucilla since 1880
- 3,572
- Most popular year
- 1949
- 83 babies
Boys and girls named Drucilla, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 82 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 121 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 158 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 305 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 488 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 401 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 644 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 632 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 247 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 125 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 48 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 30 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,876 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,946 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,706 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,275 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,895 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,457 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,790 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,465 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,395 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,168 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 8 | #11,313 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,361 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,865 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,147 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,414 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,149 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,723 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,155 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,007 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,836 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,539 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,576 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,231 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,209 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,876 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,455 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,545 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,666 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,591 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,421 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,847 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,656 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,796 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,009 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,466 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,095 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,032 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,993 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,051 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,022 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,846 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,524 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,077 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,950 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,159 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,100 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,176 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,700 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,704 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,802 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,438 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,791 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,313 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,197 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,123 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,140 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,173 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,081 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,020 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 83 | #985 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,059 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 79 | #994 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,112 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,086 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 74 | #889 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 71 | #924 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,102 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,071 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 58 | #945 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,055 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,114 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,310 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,118 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,208 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,270 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,144 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,118 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 50 | #986 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,092 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,198 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,149 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,067 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,024 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,326 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,115 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,102 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 69 | #880 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,037 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,124 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,161 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,009 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,222 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,176 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,203 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,396 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,187 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,038 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 23 | #908 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,082 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,023 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 18 | #951 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 20 | #847 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 19 | #852 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,111 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 15 | #944 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 13 | #991 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 16 | #878 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 18 | #776 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,185 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 11 | #997 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 19 | #773 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 15 | #836 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,009 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 13 | #902 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,163 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,034 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 12 | #867 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 12 | #807 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 11 | #837 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 8 | #964 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 11 | #803 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,065 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 12 | #666 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 11 | #667 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,065 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 9 | #660 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #839 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #699 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 7 | #692 |
Highest rank
Drucilla has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #660 in 1883. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Drucilla
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.