Is Dustin a boy or girl name?
Dustin is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 394 boys were named Dustin, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 209,352 US babies named Dustin were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #685
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Dustin since 1916
- 209,352
- Most popular year
- 1985
- 10,520 babies
Boys and girls named Dustin, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 28 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 53 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 17 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 196 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 284 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,594 | 31 | 1.9% |
| 1970s | 26,573 | 295 | 1.1% |
| 1980s | 97,315 | 839 | 0.9% |
| 1990s | 56,768 | 167 | 0.3% |
| 2000s | 16,539 | 48 | 0.3% |
| 2010s | 6,541 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,064 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 394 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 382 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 442 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 443 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 403 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 490 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 543 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 535 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 554 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 577 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 696 | #435 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 674 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 800 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 804 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 868 | #353 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,008 | #316 | 6 | #15,793 |
| 2008 | 1,103 | #301 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,263 | #272 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,338 | #258 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,477 | #232 | 7 | #13,397 |
| 2004 | 1,554 | #223 | 17 | #6,872 |
| 2003 | 1,769 | #207 | 5 | #16,483 |
| 2002 | 1,982 | #189 | 5 | #16,169 |
| 2001 | 2,424 | #158 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 2,621 | #148 | 8 | #11,025 |
| 1999 | 2,844 | #133 | 8 | #10,635 |
| 1998 | 3,445 | #108 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 4,277 | #88 | 11 | #7,920 |
| 1996 | 4,874 | #79 | 21 | #4,778 |
| 1995 | 5,921 | #62 | 16 | #5,754 |
| 1994 | 6,459 | #56 | 15 | #6,077 |
| 1993 | 6,310 | #59 | 19 | #5,049 |
| 1992 | 6,798 | #58 | 22 | #4,579 |
| 1991 | 7,383 | #56 | 24 | #4,240 |
| 1990 | 8,457 | #50 | 31 | #3,455 |
| 1989 | 9,715 | #48 | 46 | #2,489 |
| 1988 | 9,336 | #48 | 85 | #1,554 |
| 1987 | 10,108 | #44 | 78 | #1,594 |
| 1986 | 10,317 | #42 | 110 | #1,243 |
| 1985 | 10,439 | #41 | 81 | #1,507 |
| 1984 | 10,403 | #41 | 88 | #1,356 |
| 1983 | 9,679 | #43 | 95 | #1,286 |
| 1982 | 9,550 | #42 | 80 | #1,493 |
| 1981 | 9,353 | #42 | 102 | #1,265 |
| 1980 | 8,415 | #44 | 74 | #1,573 |
| 1979 | 4,899 | #62 | 57 | #1,860 |
| 1978 | 4,177 | #68 | 35 | #2,485 |
| 1977 | 3,477 | #81 | 37 | #2,384 |
| 1976 | 3,212 | #82 | 32 | #2,497 |
| 1975 | 2,678 | #96 | 26 | #2,830 |
| 1974 | 2,197 | #121 | 18 | #3,592 |
| 1973 | 1,616 | #153 | 29 | #2,520 |
| 1972 | 1,561 | #165 | 21 | #3,094 |
| 1971 | 1,471 | #181 | 22 | #3,083 |
| 1970 | 1,285 | #202 | 18 | #3,468 |
| 1969 | 758 | #271 | 15 | #3,663 |
| 1968 | 448 | #369 | 16 | #3,360 |
| 1967 | 51 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 50 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 52 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 40 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 43 | #1,181 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 53 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 46 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 53 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 39 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 19 | #1,859 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 32 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 27 | #1,515 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 42 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 31 | #1,364 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 22 | #1,647 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 27 | #1,468 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 24 | #1,533 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 21 | #1,625 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 31 | #1,309 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 22 | #1,574 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 31 | #1,324 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 26 | #1,390 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 26 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 16 | #1,760 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 12 | #2,208 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 11 | #2,296 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 7 | #2,954 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 14 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,370 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,038 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 7 | #3,548 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,835 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,084 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 6 | #3,936 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 11 | #2,676 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 6 | #3,987 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 8 | #3,286 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 6 | #3,848 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 10 | #2,744 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 7 | #3,309 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,085 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Dustin reached #41 in 1984. As a girl name, it reached #1,243 in 1986. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Dustin
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.