Is Easton a boy or girl name?
Easton is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 27 girls and 3,336 boys were named Easton, so 0.8% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 1.3% of the 77,195 US babies named Easton were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #103
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,911
- Babies named Easton since 1907
- 77,195
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 5,703 babies
Boys and girls named Easton, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 41 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 36 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 27 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 208 | 6 | 2.8% |
| 1990s | 1,406 | 81 | 5.4% |
| 2000s | 7,192 | 158 | 2.1% |
| 2010s | 46,795 | 539 | 1.1% |
| 2020s | 20,420 | 195 | 0.9% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,336 | #103 | 27 | #4,911 |
| 2023 | 3,644 | #98 | 30 | #4,589 |
| 2022 | 4,161 | #80 | 44 | #3,550 |
| 2021 | 4,625 | #72 | 53 | #3,078 |
| 2020 | 4,654 | #73 | 41 | #3,631 |
| 2019 | 4,893 | #74 | 51 | #3,135 |
| 2018 | 5,460 | #66 | 51 | #3,172 |
| 2017 | 5,519 | #66 | 51 | #3,166 |
| 2016 | 5,642 | #66 | 61 | #2,810 |
| 2015 | 5,229 | #78 | 72 | #2,508 |
| 2014 | 4,988 | #83 | 66 | #2,658 |
| 2013 | 4,649 | #88 | 55 | #3,017 |
| 2012 | 3,943 | #96 | 52 | #3,181 |
| 2011 | 3,762 | #103 | 43 | #3,622 |
| 2010 | 2,710 | #145 | 37 | #4,048 |
| 2009 | 1,369 | #254 | 20 | #6,635 |
| 2008 | 1,105 | #300 | 30 | #4,930 |
| 2007 | 904 | #352 | 14 | #8,658 |
| 2006 | 844 | #357 | 14 | #8,377 |
| 2005 | 735 | #390 | 18 | #6,620 |
| 2004 | 619 | #419 | 20 | #6,044 |
| 2003 | 504 | #490 | 9 | #10,688 |
| 2002 | 413 | #540 | 13 | #7,960 |
| 2001 | 355 | #578 | 8 | #11,315 |
| 2000 | 344 | #581 | 12 | #8,182 |
| 1999 | 269 | #644 | 12 | #7,867 |
| 1998 | 254 | #670 | 13 | #7,225 |
| 1997 | 194 | #769 | 12 | #7,415 |
| 1996 | 168 | #842 | 15 | #6,150 |
| 1995 | 144 | #923 | 9 | #8,979 |
| 1994 | 120 | #1,013 | 7 | #10,901 |
| 1993 | 85 | #1,230 | 6 | #12,222 |
| 1992 | 59 | #1,513 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 54 | #1,577 | 7 | #10,600 |
| 1990 | 59 | #1,472 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 45 | #1,710 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 25 | #2,391 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 22 | #2,493 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 32 | #1,885 | 6 | #9,880 |
| 1985 | 20 | #2,531 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 27 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 18 | #2,603 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 10 | #4,023 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 9 | #4,257 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 5 | #6,085 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 7 | #4,738 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 6 | #4,987 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 7 | #4,206 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,108 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 6 | #3,733 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 7 | #3,415 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 6 | #3,609 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 7 | #3,080 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 5 | #3,889 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,566 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,644 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,592 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,693 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,039 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 5 | #3,826 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,482 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 8 | #2,917 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,154 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,597 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,568 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 8 | #3,328 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 6 | #3,989 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 9 | #3,020 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,185 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,146 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,597 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 6 | #3,513 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,727 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,647 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Easton reached #66 in 2016. As a girl name, it reached #2,508 in 2015. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Easton
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.