Is Eduardo a boy or girl name?
Eduardo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 866 boys were named Eduardo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.4% of the 109,898 US babies named Eduardo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #374
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Eduardo since 1890
- 109,898
- Most popular year
- 2001
- 3,435 babies
Boys and girls named Eduardo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 43 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 67 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 304 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 825 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 803 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 978 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 2,243 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 4,967 | 6 | 0.1% |
| 1970s | 8,678 | 70 | 0.8% |
| 1980s | 11,441 | 104 | 0.9% |
| 1990s | 27,220 | 155 | 0.6% |
| 2000s | 31,407 | 91 | 0.3% |
| 2010s | 15,745 | 7 | 0% |
| 2020s | 4,744 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 866 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 921 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 981 | #341 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 975 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 1,001 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,065 | #315 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 1,071 | #316 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,229 | #291 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,324 | #275 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,448 | #251 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,431 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,691 | #221 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,859 | #205 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 2,082 | #185 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 2,545 | #154 | 7 | #13,887 |
| 2009 | 3,336 | #128 | 8 | #12,777 |
| 2008 | 2,871 | #142 | 5 | #18,313 |
| 2007 | 2,845 | #143 | 8 | #13,029 |
| 2006 | 3,317 | #126 | 5 | #17,926 |
| 2005 | 3,180 | #129 | 10 | #10,355 |
| 2004 | 3,201 | #126 | 9 | #10,945 |
| 2003 | 3,121 | #129 | 9 | #10,692 |
| 2002 | 2,957 | #133 | 10 | #9,701 |
| 2001 | 3,418 | #112 | 17 | #6,409 |
| 2000 | 3,161 | #124 | 10 | #9,366 |
| 1999 | 2,630 | #145 | 10 | #8,984 |
| 1998 | 2,487 | #145 | 11 | #8,159 |
| 1997 | 2,624 | #140 | 6 | #12,550 |
| 1996 | 3,017 | #123 | 12 | #7,275 |
| 1995 | 3,151 | #117 | 14 | #6,359 |
| 1994 | 3,276 | #113 | 21 | #4,731 |
| 1993 | 2,794 | #125 | 21 | #4,707 |
| 1992 | 2,561 | #132 | 17 | #5,548 |
| 1991 | 2,521 | #129 | 22 | #4,540 |
| 1990 | 2,159 | #149 | 21 | #4,562 |
| 1989 | 1,937 | #156 | 15 | #5,629 |
| 1988 | 1,385 | #198 | 11 | #6,782 |
| 1987 | 1,079 | #220 | 10 | #6,941 |
| 1986 | 1,022 | #229 | 11 | #6,288 |
| 1985 | 1,050 | #223 | 10 | #6,586 |
| 1984 | 1,003 | #224 | 5 | #10,872 |
| 1983 | 973 | #230 | 9 | #6,863 |
| 1982 | 996 | #234 | 14 | #5,006 |
| 1981 | 946 | #238 | 8 | #7,594 |
| 1980 | 1,050 | #227 | 11 | #6,028 |
| 1979 | 967 | #232 | 6 | #9,313 |
| 1978 | 1,001 | #217 | 8 | #7,125 |
| 1977 | 960 | #225 | 12 | #5,284 |
| 1976 | 996 | #211 | 7 | #7,512 |
| 1975 | 846 | #243 | 7 | #7,378 |
| 1974 | 811 | #248 | 9 | #5,890 |
| 1973 | 891 | #238 | 7 | #6,861 |
| 1972 | 711 | #273 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 736 | #281 | 7 | #6,795 |
| 1970 | 759 | #277 | 7 | #6,532 |
| 1969 | 669 | #291 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 594 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 527 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 526 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 523 | #330 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 470 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 446 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 474 | #369 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 370 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 368 | #414 | 6 | #5,887 |
| 1959 | 318 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 314 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 261 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 234 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 242 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 197 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 182 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 174 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 173 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 148 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 139 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 126 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 113 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 121 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 94 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 91 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 91 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 63 | #813 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 76 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 64 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 70 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 74 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 78 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 76 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 76 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 92 | #625 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 64 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 81 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 91 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 101 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 96 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 129 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 85 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 75 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 70 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 75 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 83 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 98 | #649 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 59 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 55 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 52 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 46 | #989 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 35 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 36 | #1,079 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 39 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 33 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 23 | #1,056 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 17 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 15 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 12 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 11 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 9 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 8 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 10 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 11 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 7 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 13 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 7 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 10 | #638 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Eduardo reached #112 in 2001. As a girl name, it reached #4,540 in 1991. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eduardo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.