Is Elida a boy or girl name?
Elida is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 26 girls and 0 boys were named Elida, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 7,742 US babies named Elida were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,043
- Babies named Elida since 1886
- 7,742
- Most popular year
- 1946
- 141 babies
Boys and girls named Elida, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 66 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 72 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 237 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 634 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 962 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,149 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,042 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 671 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 625 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 600 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 620 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 494 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 383 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 176 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,043 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,784 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,135 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,434 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,456 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,565 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,380 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,648 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,871 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,168 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,670 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,592 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,660 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,562 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,906 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,818 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,441 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,547 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,191 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,223 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,142 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,310 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,865 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,469 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,826 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,581 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 54 | #2,540 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,269 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,935 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,133 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,440 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,073 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,198 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,140 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,913 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,125 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,225 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,339 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,894 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,981 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,028 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,676 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,685 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,562 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,589 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,906 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,018 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,685 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,574 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,463 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,420 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,464 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,751 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,493 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,439 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,484 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,508 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,326 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,775 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,392 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,351 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,255 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,306 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,225 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,222 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,116 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,105 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 113 | #976 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 106 | #991 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,044 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,004 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 115 | #874 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 96 | #957 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 124 | #801 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 117 | #807 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 107 | #853 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 130 | #743 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 119 | #799 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 141 | #672 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 112 | #701 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 115 | #700 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 128 | #669 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 109 | #711 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 104 | #691 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 84 | #764 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 93 | #706 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 104 | #674 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 98 | #689 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 98 | #667 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 110 | #618 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 89 | #705 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 88 | #695 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 92 | #708 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 95 | #686 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 95 | #712 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 105 | #685 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 84 | #782 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 73 | #865 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 79 | #825 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 71 | #878 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 59 | #995 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,234 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,194 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,226 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,197 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,140 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,420 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,668 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,641 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,205 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,130 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,482 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,186 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,478 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,358 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,505 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,285 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,426 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,032 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,456 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,293 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,482 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,489 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,382 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,780 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,106 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,065 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,222 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,083 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 10 | #973 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,108 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,129 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,181 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,154 |
Highest rank
Elida has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #618 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.