Is Eliott a boy or girl name?
Eliott is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 80 boys were named Eliott, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,034 US babies named Eliott were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,954
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Eliott since 1888
- 2,034
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 80 babies
Boys and girls named Eliott, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1920s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1940s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 8 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 18 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 103 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 192 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 271 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 384 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 682 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 360 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 80 | #1,954 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 71 | #2,082 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 67 | #2,173 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 77 | #1,945 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 65 | #2,147 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 65 | #2,173 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 79 | #1,889 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 72 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 69 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 76 | #1,918 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 68 | #2,068 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 70 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 60 | #2,188 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 70 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 53 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 57 | #2,298 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 51 | #2,483 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 35 | #3,208 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 50 | #2,458 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 45 | #2,502 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 29 | #3,307 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 33 | #2,948 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 23 | #3,705 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 28 | #3,166 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 33 | #2,759 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 28 | #2,960 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 24 | #3,222 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 27 | #2,848 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 18 | #3,723 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 31 | #2,462 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 27 | #2,710 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 21 | #3,179 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 29 | #2,482 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 29 | #2,425 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 37 | #2,023 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 39 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 17 | #3,112 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 24 | #2,355 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 16 | #3,039 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 15 | #3,117 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 22 | #2,314 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 21 | #2,356 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,347 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 13 | #3,277 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 12 | #3,475 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 10 | #3,892 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 15 | #2,828 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 12 | #3,263 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 6 | #5,122 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 13 | #2,949 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 9 | #3,646 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 13 | #2,757 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 7 | #4,115 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 8 | #3,753 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 10 | #3,132 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,114 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 5 | #4,229 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 8 | #3,131 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 8 | #2,845 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 6 | #3,227 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,497 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Eliott reached #1,076 in 1888. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Eliott
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.