Is Elroy a boy or girl name?
Elroy is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 25 boys were named Elroy, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 7,460 US babies named Elroy were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,216
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Elroy since 1880
- 7,460
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 192 babies
Boys and girls named Elroy, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 92 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 847 | 6 | 0.7% |
| 1920s | 1,541 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,218 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 966 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 834 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 703 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 377 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 252 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 98 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 183 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | #4,216 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 28 | #3,918 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 19 | #5,082 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 24 | #4,281 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 17 | #5,313 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 27 | #3,923 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 21 | #4,646 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 22 | #4,509 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 24 | #4,232 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 23 | #4,331 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 21 | #4,588 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 11 | #7,178 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 13 | #6,418 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,269 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 12 | #6,798 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 12 | #6,921 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 7 | #10,190 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 7 | #10,085 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 10 | #7,591 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 13 | #5,970 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 12 | #6,244 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 11 | #6,384 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 9 | #7,208 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 8 | #7,758 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 9 | #7,004 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 11 | #5,768 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 6 | #8,812 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 16 | #4,111 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 13 | #4,688 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 17 | #3,744 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 13 | #4,605 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 13 | #4,528 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 15 | #3,980 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 20 | #3,153 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 28 | #2,454 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 22 | #2,814 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 24 | #2,463 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 32 | #1,949 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 25 | #2,249 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 26 | #2,139 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 17 | #2,731 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 21 | #2,357 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 33 | #1,742 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 29 | #1,912 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 23 | #2,241 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 28 | #1,916 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 27 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 29 | #1,798 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 41 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 29 | #1,723 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 43 | #1,300 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 37 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 46 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 43 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 54 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 61 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 48 | #1,072 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 50 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 59 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 57 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 84 | #826 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 77 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 81 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 89 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 97 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 88 | #814 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 73 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 96 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 83 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 83 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 82 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 91 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 83 | #773 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 69 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 86 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 79 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 81 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 88 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 83 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 91 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 106 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 103 | #623 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 120 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 104 | #580 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 111 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 90 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 108 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 129 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 130 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 122 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 117 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 125 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 123 | #526 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 138 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 136 | #513 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 150 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 132 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 154 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 138 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 164 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 158 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 162 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 192 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 152 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 139 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 136 | #512 | 6 | #4,420 |
| 1918 | 145 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 143 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 110 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 104 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 75 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 51 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 43 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 23 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 17 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 18 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 13 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 10 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 14 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #909 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 6 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,208 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 8 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 7 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 7 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 6 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,078 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 5 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,011 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 5 | #952 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Elroy reached #438 in 1922. As a girl name, it reached #4,420 in 1919. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.