Is Emmit a boy or girl name?
Emmit is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 34 boys were named Emmit, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,223 US babies named Emmit were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,397
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Emmit since 1882
- 4,223
- Most popular year
- 2012
- 137 babies
Boys and girls named Emmit, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 69 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 105 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 386 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 589 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 432 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 214 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 138 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 96 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 73 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 130 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 294 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,079 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 295 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34 | #3,397 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 44 | #2,852 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 59 | #2,386 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 73 | #2,026 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 85 | #1,780 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 81 | #1,852 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 95 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 104 | #1,572 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 121 | #1,435 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 122 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 120 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 129 | #1,330 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 137 | #1,281 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 97 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 73 | #1,930 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 41 | #2,917 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 43 | #2,798 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 31 | #3,464 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 36 | #3,044 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 31 | #3,264 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 33 | #3,038 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 23 | #3,763 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 26 | #3,384 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 19 | #4,173 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 11 | #6,039 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 21 | #3,621 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 14 | #4,723 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 17 | #3,933 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 14 | #4,449 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 16 | #3,922 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 20 | #3,364 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 6 | #7,941 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 10 | #5,358 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 12 | #4,484 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,267 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 10 | #4,537 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 6 | #6,360 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,511 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 5 | #6,623 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 11 | #3,694 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 10 | #4,029 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 11 | #3,679 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 7 | #5,106 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,056 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 7 | #4,691 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 9 | #3,936 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 9 | #3,808 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 12 | #3,007 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,076 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 9 | #3,423 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 9 | #3,457 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 16 | #2,327 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 20 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 16 | #2,053 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 10 | #2,655 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 13 | #2,261 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 10 | #2,668 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 15 | #2,139 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 7 | #3,426 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 14 | #2,215 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 14 | #2,272 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 19 | #1,874 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,880 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 27 | #1,515 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,522 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 27 | #1,517 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 18 | #1,863 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 16 | #1,985 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 15 | #2,062 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 23 | #1,592 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 24 | #1,534 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,761 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 30 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 27 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 40 | #1,154 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 30 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 27 | #1,280 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 15 | #1,836 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 25 | #1,410 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 24 | #1,432 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 23 | #1,426 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 35 | #1,112 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 44 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 42 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 31 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 51 | #854 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 31 | #1,207 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 34 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 42 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 47 | #953 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 62 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 48 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 55 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 56 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 53 | #954 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 48 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 77 | #750 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 46 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 65 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 71 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 66 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 52 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 73 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 59 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 53 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 49 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 54 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 24 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 25 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 24 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 16 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 9 | #1,141 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 16 | #692 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 8 | #1,045 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 14 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 11 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 7 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 7 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 9 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 12 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 13 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #846 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 9 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 8 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 13 | #548 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 7 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 8 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 15 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #799 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #942 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #981 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Emmit reached #480 in 1886. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Emmit
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.