Is Esequiel a boy or girl name?
Esequiel is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 16 boys were named Esequiel, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,929 US babies named Esequiel were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,714
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Esequiel since 1881
- 2,929
- Most popular year
- 1974
- 59 babies
Boys and girls named Esequiel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 103 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 172 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 213 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 221 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 212 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 378 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 399 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 447 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 357 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 176 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 89 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16 | #5,714 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 23 | #4,499 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 19 | #5,087 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 12 | #6,825 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 19 | #4,907 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 12 | #6,903 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 20 | #4,797 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 16 | #5,606 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 15 | #5,867 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 15 | #5,813 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 18 | #5,115 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 24 | #4,094 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 18 | #5,102 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 22 | #4,405 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 16 | #5,560 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 30 | #3,579 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 36 | #3,178 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 32 | #3,396 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 38 | #2,945 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 33 | #3,110 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 42 | #2,581 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 22 | #3,880 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 39 | #2,522 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 34 | #2,757 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 51 | #1,996 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 48 | #2,003 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 42 | #2,168 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 49 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 51 | #1,790 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 48 | #1,817 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 40 | #2,054 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 35 | #2,229 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 56 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 37 | #2,030 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 41 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 24 | #2,636 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 40 | #1,743 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 39 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 34 | #1,806 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 39 | #1,625 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 48 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 37 | #1,609 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 42 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 52 | #1,277 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 44 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 36 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 30 | #1,766 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 33 | #1,652 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 47 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 43 | #1,326 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 59 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 32 | #1,524 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 41 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 28 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 29 | #1,589 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 19 | #1,928 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 26 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 23 | #1,622 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 21 | #1,698 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 29 | #1,441 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 22 | #1,709 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 17 | #1,992 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 19 | #1,869 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 17 | #2,022 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 19 | #1,875 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 18 | #1,931 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 14 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 25 | #1,595 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 23 | #1,657 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 24 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 22 | #1,643 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 27 | #1,460 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 17 | #1,885 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 25 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 26 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 22 | #1,591 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 20 | #1,672 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 21 | #1,667 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 35 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 18 | #1,593 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 28 | #1,265 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 21 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 17 | #1,758 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 15 | #1,840 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 16 | #1,753 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 15 | #1,822 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 12 | #2,113 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 12 | #2,124 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 13 | #1,987 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 11 | #2,292 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 20 | #1,575 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 17 | #1,727 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 17 | #1,798 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 21 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 14 | #2,106 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 15 | #2,032 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 25 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 16 | #2,069 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 15 | #2,110 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 16 | #2,035 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,861 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 13 | #2,373 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 13 | #2,381 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 17 | #2,007 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 23 | #1,610 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 20 | #1,717 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 25 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 16 | #1,922 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 9 | #2,781 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 11 | #2,354 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 10 | #2,152 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 7 | #2,344 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,662 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 5 | #913 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Esequiel reached #913 in 1881. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Esequiel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.