Is Fawn a boy or girl name?
Fawn is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 22 girls and 0 boys were named Fawn, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 5,615 US babies named Fawn were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,656
- Babies named Fawn since 1900
- 5,615
- Most popular year
- 1981
- 206 babies
Boys and girls named Fawn, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 92 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 127 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 84 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 548 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,095 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,393 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,433 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 331 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 139 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 154 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 106 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,656 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,444 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,078 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,883 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,426 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,811 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,365 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,903 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,251 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,308 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,534 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,279 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,682 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,657 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,679 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,890 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,069 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,500 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,054 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,631 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,532 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,150 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,178 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,422 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,372 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,006 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,207 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,425 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,605 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,902 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,158 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,367 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,747 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,094 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,015 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,499 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,206 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,072 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 111 | #1,235 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,099 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 133 | #1,055 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 166 | #906 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 156 | #952 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 206 | #788 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 165 | #914 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 158 | #935 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 150 | #943 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 198 | #763 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 160 | #854 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 153 | #873 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 136 | #925 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 121 | #985 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,120 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,040 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,147 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,306 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,113 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,109 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 131 | #877 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 112 | #974 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 121 | #958 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 121 | #966 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,105 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 132 | #939 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 125 | #956 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,015 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,546 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,294 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,214 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,349 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,242 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,416 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,691 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,268 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,803 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,897 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,028 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,221 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,928 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,352 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,859 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,633 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,806 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,558 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,602 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,358 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,850 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,524 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,996 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,961 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,130 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,053 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,452 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,630 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,426 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,199 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,102 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,835 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,711 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,994 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,475 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,833 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,425 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,301 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,626 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,761 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,171 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,297 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,496 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,637 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,746 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,844 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,803 |
Highest rank
Fawn has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #763 in 1977. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.