Is Francesco a boy or girl name?
Francesco is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 160 boys were named Francesco, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 8,299 US babies named Francesco were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,241
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Francesco since 1906
- 8,299
- Most popular year
- 2006
- 166 babies
Boys and girls named Francesco, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 24 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 286 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 202 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 106 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 282 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 502 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 997 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,064 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,337 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,478 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,256 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 699 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 160 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 147 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 128 | #1,427 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 130 | #1,411 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 134 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 107 | #1,568 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 122 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 120 | #1,436 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 137 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 131 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 144 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 121 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 119 | #1,401 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 138 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 117 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 151 | #1,197 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 127 | #1,350 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 153 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 166 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 161 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 143 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 142 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 148 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 139 | #1,051 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 148 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 145 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 139 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 118 | #1,078 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 131 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 139 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 124 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 136 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 114 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 140 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 151 | #837 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 111 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 106 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 113 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 108 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 108 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 96 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 91 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 92 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 108 | #846 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 131 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 105 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 106 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 102 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 112 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 119 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 105 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 102 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 78 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 80 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 88 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 75 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 70 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 62 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 48 | #1,062 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 53 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 52 | #1,051 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 43 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 38 | #1,262 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 33 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 28 | #1,536 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 20 | #1,824 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 36 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 39 | #1,257 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 33 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 31 | #1,383 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 31 | #1,368 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 35 | #1,266 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 26 | #1,497 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 13 | #2,172 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 19 | #1,724 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 15 | #1,971 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 15 | #2,020 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 6 | #3,297 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 5 | #3,714 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 6 | #3,339 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 9 | #2,513 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 7 | #2,978 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 8 | #2,751 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 10 | #2,346 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 9 | #2,598 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 11 | #2,314 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,416 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 10 | #2,519 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 16 | #1,875 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 20 | #1,667 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 17 | #1,888 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 15 | #2,087 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 12 | #2,453 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 23 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 15 | #2,123 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 19 | #1,862 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 26 | #1,480 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 30 | #1,373 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 23 | #1,612 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 34 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 30 | #1,299 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 39 | #1,068 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 28 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 36 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 36 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 36 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 28 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 13 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,405 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Francesco reached #760 in 1908. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Francesco
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.