Is Frida a boy or girl name?
Frida is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 185 girls and 0 boys were named Frida, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 8,352 US babies named Frida were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,252
- Babies named Frida since 1892
- 8,352
- Most popular year
- 2017
- 418 babies
Boys and girls named Frida, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 37 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 42 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 29 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 50 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 37 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 648 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,159 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 3,075 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,183 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 185 | #1,252 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,153 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 224 | #1,107 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 264 | #982 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 299 | #890 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 386 | #732 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 418 | #696 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 418 | #695 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 357 | #797 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 326 | #858 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 286 | #946 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,223 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 217 | #1,133 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 223 | #1,106 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 247 | #1,017 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 287 | #931 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 314 | #886 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 347 | #829 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 320 | #839 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 352 | #757 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 368 | #727 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 409 | #648 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 318 | #761 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 248 | #912 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 196 | #1,061 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,403 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,296 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,791 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,936 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,855 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,636 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,546 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,707 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,170 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,917 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,278 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,610 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,506 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,596 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,967 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,701 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,908 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,739 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,772 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,241 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,986 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,158 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,488 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,275 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,033 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,095 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,652 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,898 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,064 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,605 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,620 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,263 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,414 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,226 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,935 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,560 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,441 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,580 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,792 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,982 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,280 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,121 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,236 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,511 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,590 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,025 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,866 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,685 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,569 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,972 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,152 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,891 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,691 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,537 |
Highest rank
Frida has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #648 in 2003. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Frida
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.