Is Garth a boy or girl name?
Garth is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 18 boys were named Garth, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 9,659 US babies named Garth were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,283
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Garth since 1906
- 9,659
- Most popular year
- 1954
- 268 babies
Boys and girls named Garth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 395 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 765 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 676 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 850 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,603 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,854 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 1,390 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 774 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 956 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 156 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 138 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 92 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | #5,283 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 22 | #4,644 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 21 | #4,760 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 11 | #7,260 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 20 | #4,755 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 16 | #5,645 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 15 | #5,864 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,892 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 13 | #6,466 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 20 | #4,773 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 16 | #5,556 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 12 | #6,747 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 8 | #9,143 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 7 | #9,982 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 16 | #5,572 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 8 | #9,268 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 19 | #4,956 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 6 | #11,400 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,233 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 14 | #5,674 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 16 | #5,088 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 15 | #5,120 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 17 | #4,571 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 30 | #3,013 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 22 | #3,680 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 37 | #2,416 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 50 | #1,941 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 46 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 50 | #1,826 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 56 | #1,632 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 62 | #1,524 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 124 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 249 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 200 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 82 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 54 | #1,523 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 54 | #1,435 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 59 | #1,275 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 61 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 61 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 74 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 72 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 98 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 133 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 108 | #854 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 124 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 118 | #775 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 106 | #828 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 110 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 137 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 157 | #644 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 150 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 152 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 146 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 190 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 192 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 133 | #655 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 157 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 170 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 159 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 239 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 209 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 184 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 211 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 200 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 186 | #573 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 156 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 146 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 175 | #577 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 200 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 268 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 158 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 106 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 109 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 99 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 98 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 80 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 100 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 80 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 63 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 83 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 86 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 101 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 73 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 86 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 60 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 82 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 83 | #651 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 59 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 71 | #727 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 73 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 72 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 69 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 53 | #880 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 54 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 73 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 68 | #790 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 80 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 75 | #741 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 68 | #805 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 78 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 100 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 66 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 77 | #763 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 80 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 80 | #697 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 59 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 77 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 53 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 68 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 22 | #1,283 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 24 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,381 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,610 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,543 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Garth reached #444 in 1954. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.