Is Gladis a boy or girl name?
Gladis is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 10 girls and 0 boys were named Gladis, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 3,065 US babies named Gladis were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #9,767
- Babies named Gladis since 1898
- 3,065
- Most popular year
- 1990
- 69 babies
Boys and girls named Gladis, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 319 | 100% |
| 1920s | 5 | 454 | 98.9% |
| 1930s | 0 | 266 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 143 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 120 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 56 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 82 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 256 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 567 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 464 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,767 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,199 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,397 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,759 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,575 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,775 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,299 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,011 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,071 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,083 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,681 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,903 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,964 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,665 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,303 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 38 | #4,046 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 38 | #4,116 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,834 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,103 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,284 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,582 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,718 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,541 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,507 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,957 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,869 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,809 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,744 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,291 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,059 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,555 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,076 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,200 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,223 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,978 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,681 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,712 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,456 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,928 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,024 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,547 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,085 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,602 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,774 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,646 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,097 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,173 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,627 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,337 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,421 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,125 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,308 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 6 | #7,367 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,863 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,838 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,137 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,915 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,860 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,450 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,509 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,485 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,699 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,220 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,807 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,668 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,101 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,166 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,845 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,862 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,528 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,621 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,378 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,011 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,747 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,319 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,528 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,490 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,325 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,609 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,824 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,836 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,989 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,562 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,155 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,748 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,563 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,393 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,297 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,568 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,224 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,320 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,262 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,352 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,321 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,093 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,016 |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,484 | 33 | #1,423 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,143 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 58 | #980 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,048 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,157 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,045 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,144 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,208 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,170 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 50 | #970 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,061 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 36 | #995 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,246 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,229 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,043 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,136 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 22 | #877 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,297 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,054 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,625 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,118 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,199 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,676 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,366 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,172 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,492 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,423 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Gladis reached #4,484 in 1925. As a girl name, it reached #877 in 1909. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Gladis
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.