Is Graciela a boy or girl name?
Graciela is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 102 girls and 0 boys were named Graciela, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 16,244 US babies named Graciela were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,943
- Babies named Graciela since 1916
- 16,244
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 428 babies
Boys and girls named Graciela, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 153 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 331 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 782 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,752 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,065 | 100% |
| 1970s | 12 | 2,181 | 99.5% |
| 1980s | 16 | 1,810 | 99.1% |
| 1990s | 11 | 2,676 | 99.6% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,593 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,335 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 511 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,943 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,053 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,908 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,888 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,861 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,643 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,712 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,909 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,887 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 115 | #1,816 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,638 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 143 | #1,532 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 157 | #1,453 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,579 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 187 | #1,275 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 223 | #1,136 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,157 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 275 | #977 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 237 | #1,076 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 278 | #902 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 287 | #855 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 276 | #873 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 241 | #931 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 275 | #834 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 279 | #812 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 307 | #733 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 428 | #574 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 287 | #745 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 274 | #770 |
| 1995 | 5 | #9,344 | 283 | #722 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 252 | #803 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 220 | #878 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 218 | #900 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 216 | #902 |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,494 | 191 | #977 |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,315 | 203 | #906 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,046 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 159 | #988 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 152 | #1,012 |
| 1985 | 5 | #6,919 | 180 | #889 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 166 | #900 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 191 | #812 |
| 1982 | 5 | #6,711 | 178 | #865 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 187 | #836 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 240 | #708 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 236 | #715 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 211 | #739 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 211 | #729 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 231 | #664 |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,779 | 210 | #707 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 242 | #634 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 231 | #648 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 189 | #738 |
| 1971 | 7 | #4,124 | 193 | #761 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 227 | #691 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 215 | #677 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 205 | #678 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 213 | #658 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 222 | #645 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 201 | #694 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 218 | #701 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 189 | #749 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 193 | #744 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 236 | #675 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 173 | #777 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 224 | #668 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 179 | #747 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 202 | #701 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 188 | #698 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 158 | #758 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 169 | #709 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 189 | #653 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 166 | #693 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 155 | #703 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 122 | #787 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 135 | #732 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 125 | #764 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 97 | #900 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 90 | #875 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 73 | #884 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 69 | #929 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,146 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,070 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,093 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,105 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,315 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,072 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,371 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,122 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,144 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,457 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,451 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,225 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,302 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,475 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,353 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,407 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,130 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,398 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,422 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,230 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,623 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,671 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,721 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,153 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,110 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,128 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,114 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Graciela reached #4,124 in 1971. As a girl name, it reached #574 in 1998. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Graciela
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.