Is Janeth a boy or girl name?
Janeth is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 64 girls and 0 boys were named Janeth, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,760 US babies named Janeth were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,697
- Babies named Janeth since 1915
- 4,760
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 175 babies
Boys and girls named Janeth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 23 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 113 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 141 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 235 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 285 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 990 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,513 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 816 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 285 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,697 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,487 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,351 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,177 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,358 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,528 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,821 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,533 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,397 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 89 | #2,143 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,161 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,972 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,034 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,846 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 83 | #2,304 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,964 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,599 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,540 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,362 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 171 | #1,303 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,267 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 175 | #1,215 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 170 | #1,200 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 132 | #1,430 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,437 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,519 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,682 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,491 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,590 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,569 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,774 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,534 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,533 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,496 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,709 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,008 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,896 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,281 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,750 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,772 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,649 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,173 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,231 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,282 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,398 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,210 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,338 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,035 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,752 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,460 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,172 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,299 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,385 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,259 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,598 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,372 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,930 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,033 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,043 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,202 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,543 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,675 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,677 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,588 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,518 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,096 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,790 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,018 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,667 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,222 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,636 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,159 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,277 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,932 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,302 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,911 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,735 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,532 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,429 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,331 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,609 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,487 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,715 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,997 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,914 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,775 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,043 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,324 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,492 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,025 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,209 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,420 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,148 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,904 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,370 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,046 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,482 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,794 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,688 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,341 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,657 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,373 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,222 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,155 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,128 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,268 |
Highest rank
Janeth has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,200 in 2002. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Janeth
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.