Is Jarrett a boy or girl name?
Jarrett is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 67 boys were named Jarrett, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 22,913 US babies named Jarrett were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,173
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jarrett since 1880
- 22,913
- Most popular year
- 1998
- 1,020 babies
Boys and girls named Jarrett, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 65 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 126 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 210 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 227 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 617 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 2,526 | 15 | 0.6% |
| 1980s | 4,914 | 41 | 0.8% |
| 1990s | 6,896 | 12 | 0.2% |
| 2000s | 5,129 | 10 | 0.2% |
| 2010s | 1,573 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 411 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67 | #2,173 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 67 | #2,158 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 82 | #1,910 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 85 | #1,826 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 110 | #1,519 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 133 | #1,349 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 108 | #1,557 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 141 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 130 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 166 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 193 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 142 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 200 | #995 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 184 | #1,033 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 176 | #1,092 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 226 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 233 | #896 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 323 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 345 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 398 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 464 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 616 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 699 | #376 | 5 | #16,547 |
| 2001 | 820 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 1,005 | #299 | 5 | #16,065 |
| 1999 | 955 | #301 | 6 | #13,358 |
| 1998 | 1,020 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 889 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 636 | #372 | 6 | #12,474 |
| 1995 | 559 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 562 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 601 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 495 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 570 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 609 | #380 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 637 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 539 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 548 | #356 | 6 | #10,383 |
| 1986 | 530 | #358 | 9 | #7,356 |
| 1985 | 481 | #377 | 9 | #7,192 |
| 1984 | 413 | #403 | 11 | #6,048 |
| 1983 | 434 | #384 | 6 | #9,490 |
| 1982 | 450 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 487 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 395 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 360 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 330 | #439 | 5 | #10,372 |
| 1977 | 267 | #500 | 5 | #10,220 |
| 1976 | 258 | #496 | 5 | #9,861 |
| 1975 | 237 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 250 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 262 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 184 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 199 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 179 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 173 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 125 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 87 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 69 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 35 | #1,305 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 32 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 21 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 30 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 25 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 20 | #1,838 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,890 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 11 | #2,573 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 18 | #1,919 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 24 | #1,624 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 24 | #1,587 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 25 | #1,541 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 28 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 33 | #1,309 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 21 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 24 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 29 | #1,363 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 22 | #1,585 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 26 | #1,464 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 21 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 20 | #1,511 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 21 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 23 | #1,476 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 18 | #1,706 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 18 | #1,661 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 12 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 18 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 12 | #2,131 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 20 | #1,558 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 14 | #1,926 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 10 | #2,455 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 10 | #2,475 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 9 | #2,634 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 11 | #2,391 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 11 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,525 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 12 | #2,388 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 9 | #2,950 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 14 | #2,241 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 10 | #2,806 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 15 | #2,133 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 14 | #2,290 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 12 | #2,523 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 15 | #2,193 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 15 | #2,207 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,641 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 13 | #2,324 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 8 | #3,244 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 7 | #3,388 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,633 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 11 | #2,376 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 10 | #2,187 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 6 | #2,641 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 6 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 6 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 6 | #871 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jarrett reached #282 in 1998. As a girl name, it reached #6,048 in 1984. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jarrett
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.