Is Jarvis a boy or girl name?
Jarvis is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 76 boys were named Jarvis, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.7% of the 17,799 US babies named Jarvis were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,015
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jarvis since 1882
- 17,799
- Most popular year
- 1989
- 644 babies
Boys and girls named Jarvis, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 21 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 39 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 273 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 438 | 6 | 1.4% |
| 1930s | 436 | 5 | 1.1% |
| 1940s | 384 | 5 | 1.3% |
| 1950s | 879 | 8 | 0.9% |
| 1960s | 945 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 1970s | 2,044 | 29 | 1.4% |
| 1980s | 4,774 | 65 | 1.3% |
| 1990s | 3,737 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,853 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,352 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 455 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 76 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 91 | #1,777 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 89 | #1,818 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 99 | #1,671 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 100 | #1,613 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 110 | #1,537 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 108 | #1,558 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 119 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 157 | #1,204 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 133 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 154 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 144 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 141 | #1,255 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 135 | #1,275 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 151 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 144 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 172 | #1,086 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 219 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 184 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 186 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 170 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 190 | #889 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 166 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 205 | #814 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 217 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 239 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 244 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 266 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 303 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 301 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 482 | #456 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 451 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 419 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 523 | #428 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 509 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 635 | #358 | 9 | #8,310 |
| 1988 | 600 | #347 | 8 | #8,710 |
| 1987 | 497 | #386 | 5 | #12,029 |
| 1986 | 533 | #356 | 10 | #6,793 |
| 1985 | 461 | #390 | 8 | #7,852 |
| 1984 | 466 | #378 | 13 | #5,327 |
| 1983 | 453 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 386 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 403 | #409 | 5 | #11,039 |
| 1980 | 340 | #457 | 7 | #8,496 |
| 1979 | 296 | #481 | 7 | #8,384 |
| 1978 | 262 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 261 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 187 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 212 | #554 | 7 | #7,467 |
| 1974 | 187 | #582 | 6 | #8,077 |
| 1973 | 167 | #614 | 9 | #5,740 |
| 1972 | 158 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 169 | #634 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 145 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 108 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 106 | #728 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 90 | #770 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 70 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 91 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 89 | #804 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 94 | #786 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 94 | #788 | 5 | #6,962 |
| 1961 | 93 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 110 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 123 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 121 | #687 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 125 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 89 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 93 | #758 | 8 | #4,536 |
| 1954 | 73 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 71 | #854 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 67 | #855 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 65 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 52 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 44 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 44 | #1,067 | 5 | #5,582 |
| 1947 | 50 | #1,018 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 26 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 27 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 42 | #1,012 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 30 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 43 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 44 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 34 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 38 | #1,044 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 55 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 49 | #888 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 31 | #1,195 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 36 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 42 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 47 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 42 | #1,031 | 5 | #4,711 |
| 1931 | 51 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 45 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 41 | #1,082 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 35 | #1,220 | 6 | #4,427 |
| 1927 | 53 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 39 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 43 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 48 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 38 | #1,165 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 56 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 38 | #1,169 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 47 | #1,010 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 46 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 48 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 48 | #928 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 35 | #1,110 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 33 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 19 | #1,419 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 20 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 12 | #1,476 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 12 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,573 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,448 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,297 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 7 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 7 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 7 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 6 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 7 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 7 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 7 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 13 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #893 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jarvis reached #347 in 1988. As a girl name, it reached #4,427 in 1928. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.