Is Joanne a boy or girl name?
Joanne is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 68 girls and 0 boys were named Joanne, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 212,407 US babies named Joanne were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,583
- Babies named Joanne since 1888
- 212,407
- Most popular year
- 1947
- 6,074 babies
Boys and girls named Joanne, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 825 | 100% |
| 1920s | 8 | 8,391 | 99.9% |
| 1930s | 155 | 40,580 | 99.6% |
| 1940s | 121 | 51,654 | 99.8% |
| 1950s | 71 | 53,570 | 99.9% |
| 1960s | 83 | 33,364 | 99.8% |
| 1970s | 34 | 11,996 | 99.7% |
| 1980s | 22 | 5,429 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 10 | 3,001 | 99.7% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,625 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 998 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 361 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,583 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,531 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,306 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,520 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,427 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,963 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,121 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,869 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,073 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 98 | #2,020 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,800 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,039 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,932 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 93 | #2,076 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 103 | #1,951 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,907 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 129 | #1,724 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 148 | #1,547 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,550 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 148 | #1,439 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 184 | #1,214 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 177 | #1,206 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 174 | #1,182 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,124 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 226 | #944 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 211 | #981 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 236 | #893 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 248 | #837 |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,704 | 264 | #788 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 274 | #745 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 286 | #729 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 338 | #659 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 328 | #672 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 398 | #581 |
| 1990 | 5 | #8,744 | 418 | #562 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 461 | #509 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 431 | #511 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 466 | #468 |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,615 | 459 | #468 |
| 1985 | 7 | #5,424 | 525 | #420 |
| 1984 | 8 | #4,758 | 511 | #415 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 564 | #390 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 632 | #368 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 678 | #345 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 702 | #344 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 757 | #317 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 732 | #315 |
| 1977 | 5 | #6,311 | 917 | #271 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 945 | #249 |
| 1975 | 6 | #5,100 | 1,137 | #217 |
| 1974 | 7 | #4,381 | 1,254 | #202 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 1,299 | #197 |
| 1972 | 6 | #4,703 | 1,347 | #207 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 1,654 | #188 |
| 1970 | 10 | #3,169 | 1,954 | #170 |
| 1969 | 9 | #3,191 | 2,083 | #156 |
| 1968 | 11 | #2,656 | 2,132 | #154 |
| 1967 | 9 | #2,866 | 2,340 | #147 |
| 1966 | 9 | #2,876 | 2,727 | #132 |
| 1965 | 11 | #2,544 | 3,149 | #121 |
| 1964 | 7 | #3,443 | 3,574 | #116 |
| 1963 | 6 | #3,826 | 3,857 | #114 |
| 1962 | 12 | #2,441 | 4,011 | #114 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 4,616 | #102 |
| 1960 | 9 | #2,967 | 4,875 | #99 |
| 1959 | 10 | #2,729 | 5,347 | #92 |
| 1958 | 10 | #2,720 | 5,928 | #80 |
| 1957 | 13 | #2,323 | 5,111 | #94 |
| 1956 | 7 | #3,362 | 4,671 | #99 |
| 1955 | 12 | #2,364 | 4,988 | #88 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 5,435 | #78 |
| 1953 | 5 | #4,077 | 5,890 | #71 |
| 1952 | 8 | #2,977 | 5,351 | #78 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 5,358 | #73 |
| 1950 | 6 | #3,495 | 5,491 | #67 |
| 1949 | 9 | #2,703 | 5,746 | #61 |
| 1948 | 12 | #2,272 | 5,499 | #65 |
| 1947 | 11 | #2,437 | 6,063 | #56 |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,764 | 5,505 | #57 |
| 1945 | 16 | #1,731 | 4,617 | #53 |
| 1944 | 11 | #2,253 | 4,530 | #54 |
| 1943 | 11 | #2,339 | 5,269 | #49 |
| 1942 | 21 | #1,560 | 5,342 | #48 |
| 1941 | 8 | #2,766 | 4,665 | #54 |
| 1940 | 17 | #1,714 | 4,418 | #54 |
| 1939 | 19 | #1,555 | 4,225 | #53 |
| 1938 | 12 | #2,132 | 4,250 | #57 |
| 1937 | 22 | #1,472 | 4,332 | #51 |
| 1936 | 17 | #1,684 | 4,305 | #48 |
| 1935 | 18 | #1,686 | 4,565 | #44 |
| 1934 | 19 | #1,639 | 4,543 | #45 |
| 1933 | 15 | #1,872 | 3,719 | #56 |
| 1932 | 12 | #2,252 | 3,730 | #62 |
| 1931 | 11 | #2,394 | 3,757 | #68 |
| 1930 | 10 | #2,696 | 3,154 | #81 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 2,497 | #101 |
| 1928 | 8 | #3,229 | 1,649 | #142 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 1,159 | #181 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 944 | #206 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 636 | #262 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 475 | #306 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 342 | #359 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 248 | #422 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 233 | #453 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 208 | #471 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 144 | #582 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 171 | #537 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 114 | #637 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 118 | #624 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 84 | #727 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 55 | #782 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 52 | #729 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 35 | #853 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 24 | #887 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 28 | #822 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,032 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 19 | #927 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 19 | #885 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,036 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,421 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,259 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,380 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,711 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,352 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,378 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Joanne reached #1,472 in 1937. As a girl name, it reached #44 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1940s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Joanne
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.