Is Joaquin a boy or girl name?
Joaquin is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 1,009 boys were named Joaquin, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 34,717 US babies named Joaquin were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #340
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Joaquin since 1886
- 34,717
- Most popular year
- 2008
- 1,250 babies
Boys and girls named Joaquin, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 30 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 289 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 589 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 491 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 515 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 775 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,084 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 2,130 | 20 | 0.9% |
| 1980s | 2,422 | 10 | 0.4% |
| 1990s | 3,061 | 11 | 0.4% |
| 2000s | 8,172 | 12 | 0.1% |
| 2010s | 9,896 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 5,199 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,009 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 999 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 1,028 | #329 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 1,081 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 1,082 | #307 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,006 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 953 | #347 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 905 | #364 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,002 | #346 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,082 | #321 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,045 | #327 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 953 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 970 | #326 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 950 | #328 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,030 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,117 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,245 | #275 | 5 | #18,823 |
| 2007 | 1,180 | #290 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,225 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 847 | #350 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 711 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 559 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 467 | #495 | 7 | #12,811 |
| 2001 | 454 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 367 | #563 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 377 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 354 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 312 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 304 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 311 | #581 | 5 | #14,400 |
| 1994 | 298 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 299 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 270 | #628 | 6 | #12,428 |
| 1991 | 256 | #640 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 280 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 263 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 228 | #629 | 5 | #12,641 |
| 1987 | 239 | #587 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 222 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 255 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 247 | #550 | 5 | #11,106 |
| 1983 | 231 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 248 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 219 | #578 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 270 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 258 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 217 | #570 | 5 | #10,413 |
| 1977 | 206 | #587 | 5 | #10,264 |
| 1976 | 248 | #509 | 5 | #9,888 |
| 1975 | 250 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 204 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 217 | #534 | 5 | #8,950 |
| 1972 | 188 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 179 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 163 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 135 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 114 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 119 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 102 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 111 | #707 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 118 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 109 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 92 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 90 | #805 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 94 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 91 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 95 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 85 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 87 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 64 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 66 | #910 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 59 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 85 | #764 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 74 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 69 | #822 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 65 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 57 | #915 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 55 | #961 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 48 | #973 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 58 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 52 | #885 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 41 | #1,067 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 49 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 52 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 38 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 55 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 48 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 40 | #1,007 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 46 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 38 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 50 | #891 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 40 | #1,022 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 49 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 52 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 73 | #746 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 58 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 68 | #792 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 66 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 56 | #899 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 57 | #893 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 53 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 57 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 70 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 45 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 59 | #900 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 44 | #1,029 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 55 | #899 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 38 | #1,086 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 38 | #1,050 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 32 | #1,152 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 28 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 26 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 13 | #1,394 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 6 | #1,639 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 9 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #916 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,451 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 5 | #1,333 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,211 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 6 | #903 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Joaquin reached #275 in 2008. As a girl name, it reached #8,950 in 1973. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.