Is Johannah a boy or girl name?
Johannah is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 16 girls and 0 boys were named Johannah, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,088 US babies named Johannah were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,049
- Babies named Johannah since 1880
- 3,088
- Most popular year
- 2010
- 110 babies
Boys and girls named Johannah, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 39 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 51 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 60 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 62 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 63 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 115 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 110 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 205 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 374 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 567 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 576 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 633 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 102 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,049 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,048 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,324 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,019 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,733 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,104 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,277 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,030 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,158 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,461 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,632 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,470 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 86 | #2,197 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,679 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,852 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 80 | #2,408 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,973 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,903 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,653 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,743 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,416 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,557 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,655 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,790 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 51 | #2,835 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,082 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,509 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,271 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,354 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,379 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,089 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,246 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,360 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,757 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,620 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,458 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,166 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,130 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,033 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 39 | #2,508 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,812 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,447 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,918 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,171 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,448 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,023 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,040 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,217 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,219 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,090 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,154 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,062 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,971 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,257 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,935 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,376 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,610 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,740 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,330 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,471 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,703 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,384 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,114 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,298 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,913 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,629 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,053 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,242 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,464 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,109 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,004 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,680 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,186 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,538 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,491 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,765 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,145 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,535 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,669 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,036 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,946 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,311 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,223 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,668 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,663 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,048 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,839 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,531 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,829 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,530 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,116 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,847 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,690 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,060 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,734 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,854 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,213 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,834 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,231 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,345 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,512 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,555 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,214 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,570 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,799 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,345 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,671 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,372 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,268 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,260 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,071 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,601 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,660 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,494 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,248 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 10 | #991 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,128 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,051 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 9 | #921 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #982 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 11 | #662 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 8 | #712 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 5 | #880 |
Highest rank
Johannah has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #662 in 1884. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Johannah
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.