Is Jorge a boy or girl name?
Jorge is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 1,179 boys were named Jorge, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.5% of the 139,076 US babies named Jorge were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #285
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jorge since 1910
- 139,076
- Most popular year
- 2006
- 3,518 babies
Boys and girls named Jorge, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 83 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 369 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 456 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,094 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 3,333 | 12 | 0.4% |
| 1960s | 7,128 | 53 | 0.7% |
| 1970s | 14,639 | 145 | 1% |
| 1980s | 21,736 | 197 | 0.9% |
| 1990s | 32,727 | 212 | 0.6% |
| 2000s | 33,028 | 65 | 0.2% |
| 2010s | 17,705 | 6 | 0% |
| 2020s | 6,088 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,179 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 1,224 | #276 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 1,218 | #285 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 1,238 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 1,229 | #276 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 1,366 | #265 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 1,382 | #262 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 1,552 | #238 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 1,723 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 1,707 | #225 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 1,848 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 1,847 | #209 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 1,941 | #195 | 6 | #15,838 |
| 2011 | 2,043 | #188 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 2,296 | #169 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 2,514 | #155 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 2,962 | #138 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 3,269 | #128 | 5 | #18,915 |
| 2006 | 3,518 | #120 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 3,441 | #118 | 6 | #15,373 |
| 2004 | 3,440 | #118 | 8 | #12,120 |
| 2003 | 3,483 | #116 | 10 | #10,001 |
| 2002 | 3,458 | #109 | 10 | #9,842 |
| 2001 | 3,447 | #110 | 11 | #9,027 |
| 2000 | 3,496 | #107 | 15 | #6,970 |
| 1999 | 3,311 | #107 | 13 | #7,444 |
| 1998 | 3,463 | #107 | 13 | #7,307 |
| 1997 | 3,231 | #117 | 16 | #6,011 |
| 1996 | 3,463 | #113 | 18 | #5,389 |
| 1995 | 3,306 | #114 | 29 | #3,712 |
| 1994 | 3,294 | #112 | 31 | #3,563 |
| 1993 | 3,392 | #107 | 21 | #4,727 |
| 1992 | 3,303 | #109 | 28 | #3,818 |
| 1991 | 3,051 | #112 | 18 | #5,272 |
| 1990 | 2,913 | #116 | 25 | #4,056 |
| 1989 | 2,703 | #122 | 24 | #4,058 |
| 1988 | 2,475 | #122 | 21 | #4,231 |
| 1987 | 2,171 | #129 | 17 | #4,754 |
| 1986 | 2,185 | #127 | 22 | #3,816 |
| 1985 | 2,293 | #125 | 20 | #4,042 |
| 1984 | 1,866 | #144 | 19 | #4,060 |
| 1983 | 1,910 | #139 | 19 | #4,016 |
| 1982 | 2,026 | #139 | 23 | #3,577 |
| 1981 | 2,109 | #128 | 12 | #5,701 |
| 1980 | 1,998 | #139 | 20 | #3,904 |
| 1979 | 2,017 | #134 | 29 | #2,957 |
| 1978 | 1,634 | #153 | 19 | #3,834 |
| 1977 | 1,580 | #154 | 15 | #4,513 |
| 1976 | 1,654 | #152 | 10 | #5,769 |
| 1975 | 1,540 | #157 | 14 | #4,438 |
| 1974 | 1,427 | #168 | 15 | #4,111 |
| 1973 | 1,319 | #178 | 11 | #5,019 |
| 1972 | 1,197 | #194 | 7 | #6,846 |
| 1971 | 1,150 | #207 | 9 | #5,726 |
| 1970 | 1,121 | #221 | 16 | #3,778 |
| 1969 | 982 | #232 | 6 | #6,992 |
| 1968 | 904 | #237 | 10 | #4,612 |
| 1967 | 824 | #245 | 6 | #6,351 |
| 1966 | 760 | #265 | 6 | #6,112 |
| 1965 | 657 | #292 | 6 | #6,110 |
| 1964 | 608 | #313 | 7 | #5,708 |
| 1963 | 678 | #296 | 6 | #6,172 |
| 1962 | 630 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 539 | #338 | 6 | #6,155 |
| 1960 | 546 | #331 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 465 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 422 | #378 | 5 | #6,493 |
| 1957 | 423 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 371 | #391 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 369 | #377 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 344 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 273 | #427 | 7 | #4,792 |
| 1952 | 256 | #437 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 222 | #455 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 188 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 183 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 151 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 152 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 121 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 128 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 96 | #627 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 80 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 57 | #871 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 59 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 67 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 50 | #875 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 53 | #857 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 44 | #950 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 40 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 45 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 40 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 39 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 36 | #1,131 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 57 | #835 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 52 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 45 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 58 | #880 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 59 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 48 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 27 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 32 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 30 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 24 | #1,568 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 22 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 24 | #1,571 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 25 | #1,468 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 8 | #3,246 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 9 | #2,847 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 9 | #2,827 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #2,950 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 8 | #2,538 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 7 | #2,381 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 9 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jorge reached #107 in 1993. As a girl name, it reached #2,957 in 1979. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.