Is Lacie a boy or girl name?
Lacie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 55 girls and 0 boys were named Lacie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.6% of the 10,754 US babies named Lacie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,988
- Babies named Lacie since 1898
- 10,754
- Most popular year
- 1989
- 380 babies
Boys and girls named Lacie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 1910s | 11 | 64 | 85.3% |
| 1920s | 31 | 77 | 71.3% |
| 1930s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 32 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 650 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 3,158 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 2,608 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,278 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,376 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 305 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,988 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,349 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,877 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,431 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,513 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 91 | #2,083 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,035 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,911 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,733 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,578 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,540 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 152 | #1,468 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 176 | #1,337 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 173 | #1,342 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,309 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 190 | #1,282 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 237 | #1,097 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 217 | #1,176 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 271 | #968 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 299 | #845 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 281 | #875 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 304 | #810 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 144 | #1,348 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 154 | #1,280 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,132 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 191 | #1,059 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 191 | #1,039 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 206 | #961 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 198 | #967 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 231 | #848 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 248 | #810 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 281 | #741 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 340 | #659 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 373 | #605 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 349 | #642 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 380 | #577 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 347 | #585 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 364 | #552 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 331 | #583 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 339 | #575 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 375 | #518 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 303 | #589 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 297 | #604 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 241 | #699 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 181 | #855 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 174 | #879 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 188 | #799 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,436 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,876 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,390 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,779 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,698 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,631 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,574 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,160 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,698 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,922 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,673 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,228 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,537 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,868 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,070 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,034 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,910 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,565 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,013 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,644 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,328 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,895 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,782 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,366 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,545 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,635 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,303 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,298 | 6 | #4,331 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,605 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,960 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,743 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,697 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,224 |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,658 | 6 | #4,684 |
| 1922 | 6 | #4,091 | 7 | #4,239 |
| 1921 | 8 | #3,360 | 8 | #3,850 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,653 | 10 | #3,227 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,048 |
| 1918 | 6 | #3,952 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,226 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,739 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,008 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,760 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,739 | 8 | #2,252 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,334 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,570 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,871 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,307 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,085 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,704 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,833 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,234 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,825 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lacie reached #2,739 in 1912. As a girl name, it reached #518 in 1984. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lacie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.