Is Lauro a boy or girl name?
Lauro is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 25 boys were named Lauro, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,160 US babies named Lauro were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,259
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lauro since 1912
- 2,160
- Most popular year
- 2000
- 48 babies
Boys and girls named Lauro, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 54 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 141 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 133 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 129 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 173 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 177 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 272 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 301 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 295 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 175 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 81 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | #4,259 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 17 | #5,583 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 15 | #6,026 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 15 | #5,916 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 9 | #8,452 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 13 | #6,632 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 18 | #5,227 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 17 | #5,429 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 13 | #6,563 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 19 | #4,983 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 22 | #4,473 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 22 | #4,405 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 17 | #5,398 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 15 | #5,842 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 19 | #4,955 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 23 | #4,369 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 27 | #3,884 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 41 | #2,901 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 29 | #3,575 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 23 | #3,999 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 26 | #3,594 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 27 | #3,414 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 26 | #3,413 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 25 | #3,470 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 48 | #2,111 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 25 | #3,241 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 22 | #3,452 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 32 | #2,528 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 39 | #2,165 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 25 | #2,893 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 29 | #2,597 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 24 | #2,910 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 38 | #2,073 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 30 | #2,375 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 37 | #2,033 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 31 | #2,230 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 27 | #2,283 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 26 | #2,246 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 29 | #2,033 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 35 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 20 | #2,497 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 21 | #2,381 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 33 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 17 | #2,736 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 33 | #1,752 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 24 | #2,134 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 19 | #2,436 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 23 | #2,101 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,768 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 26 | #1,863 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 18 | #2,323 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,459 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 17 | #2,296 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 31 | #1,581 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 26 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 18 | #2,018 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 18 | #1,932 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 25 | #1,555 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 13 | #2,289 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 18 | #1,893 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 18 | #1,944 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 19 | #1,869 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 13 | #2,318 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 18 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 17 | #2,014 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 23 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 22 | #1,737 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 15 | #2,135 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 16 | #2,015 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 8 | #3,075 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 21 | #1,695 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 17 | #1,907 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 11 | #2,440 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 21 | #1,636 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 24 | #1,532 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 18 | #1,789 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 10 | #2,587 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 7 | #3,054 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 11 | #2,196 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 13 | #2,043 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 13 | #2,123 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 8 | #2,827 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 10 | #2,418 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 15 | #1,856 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 9 | #2,542 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 13 | #2,044 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 15 | #1,879 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 12 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 14 | #1,992 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 12 | #2,191 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 22 | #1,480 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 11 | #2,398 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 16 | #1,891 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 9 | #2,900 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 11 | #2,524 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 9 | #2,964 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 22 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,272 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 19 | #1,842 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 20 | #1,813 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 15 | #2,181 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 16 | #2,103 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 12 | #2,567 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 9 | #3,090 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 9 | #3,009 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,475 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,784 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,246 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,530 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,633 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,744 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lauro reached #1,480 in 1933. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lauro
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.