Is Leana a boy or girl name?
Leana is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 90 girls and 0 boys were named Leana, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,894 US babies named Leana were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,119
- Babies named Leana since 1880
- 4,894
- Most popular year
- 2010
- 100 babies
Boys and girls named Leana, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 44 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 57 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 192 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 194 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 163 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 235 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 247 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 398 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 514 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 651 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 806 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 772 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 372 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,119 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,454 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,479 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,871 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,312 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,472 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,827 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,448 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,682 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,540 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,188 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,087 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,488 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,405 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 100 | #2,003 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 96 | #2,112 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,097 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,588 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 97 | #2,044 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 92 | #2,045 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,613 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,156 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,169 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,555 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 70 | #2,251 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,358 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,264 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,091 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,028 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,269 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,308 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,307 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 68 | #2,020 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,985 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,837 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,950 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,829 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,347 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,213 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,960 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,932 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,628 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 48 | #2,131 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,288 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,031 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,169 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,680 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,282 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,040 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,543 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,088 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,877 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,114 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,151 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,222 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,329 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,390 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,597 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,895 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,505 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,717 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,000 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,573 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,795 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,549 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,129 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,142 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,609 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,351 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,508 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,052 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,648 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,872 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,438 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,978 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,376 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,061 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,923 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,811 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,964 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,059 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,636 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,912 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,925 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,250 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,259 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,395 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,384 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,211 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,375 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,651 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,478 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,188 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,839 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,489 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,658 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,657 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,302 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,042 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,871 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,094 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,990 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,447 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,441 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,525 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,782 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,287 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,576 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,655 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,843 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,468 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,964 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,511 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,081 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,015 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,085 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,491 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,116 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,270 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 15 | #990 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 20 | #819 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,171 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,919 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,279 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,083 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,732 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,608 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,671 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,021 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,167 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,105 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,541 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,223 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 9 | #931 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 9 | #927 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 9 | #805 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,126 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #978 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 6 | #797 |
Highest rank
Leana has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #797 in 1880. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Leana
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.