Is Lesly a boy or girl name?
Lesly is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 222 girls and 0 boys were named Lesly, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 96.8% of the 15,635 US babies named Lesly were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,100
- Babies named Lesly since 1919
- 15,635
- Most popular year
- 2003
- 847 babies
Boys and girls named Lesly, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 28 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 6 | 16 | 72.7% |
| 1940s | 5 | 62 | 92.5% |
| 1950s | 36 | 157 | 81.3% |
| 1960s | 76 | 331 | 81.3% |
| 1970s | 81 | 227 | 73.7% |
| 1980s | 117 | 437 | 78.9% |
| 1990s | 95 | 2,729 | 96.6% |
| 2000s | 50 | 7,454 | 99.3% |
| 2010s | 5 | 2,850 | 99.8% |
| 2020s | 0 | 868 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,100 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 153 | #1,456 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,304 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,463 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,339 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 173 | #1,323 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 190 | #1,231 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 197 | #1,221 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 194 | #1,260 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 230 | #1,116 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 276 | #968 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 314 | #839 |
| 2012 | 5 | #13,429 | 367 | #758 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 404 | #693 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 505 | #581 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 598 | #505 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 699 | #452 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 766 | #429 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 761 | #419 |
| 2005 | 12 | #6,463 | 783 | #401 |
| 2004 | 7 | #9,549 | 747 | #407 |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,309 | 839 | #364 |
| 2002 | 7 | #9,019 | 717 | #407 |
| 2001 | 5 | #11,628 | 802 | #371 |
| 2000 | 11 | #6,161 | 742 | #389 |
| 1999 | 11 | #5,892 | 672 | #415 |
| 1998 | 13 | #5,067 | 516 | #492 |
| 1997 | 7 | #7,790 | 401 | #580 |
| 1996 | 5 | #9,927 | 330 | #671 |
| 1995 | 9 | #6,215 | 195 | #969 |
| 1994 | 10 | #5,725 | 160 | #1,127 |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,626 | 145 | #1,199 |
| 1992 | 9 | #5,935 | 112 | #1,441 |
| 1991 | 13 | #4,375 | 110 | #1,447 |
| 1990 | 8 | #6,181 | 88 | #1,681 |
| 1989 | 16 | #3,543 | 51 | #2,323 |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,339 | 54 | #2,138 |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,445 | 52 | #2,117 |
| 1986 | 5 | #7,382 | 37 | #2,654 |
| 1985 | 10 | #4,228 | 37 | #2,626 |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,205 | 45 | #2,213 |
| 1983 | 11 | #3,773 | 35 | #2,576 |
| 1982 | 12 | #3,611 | 52 | #2,006 |
| 1981 | 15 | #2,975 | 43 | #2,328 |
| 1980 | 9 | #4,360 | 31 | #2,914 |
| 1979 | 10 | #3,971 | 26 | #3,206 |
| 1978 | 8 | #4,402 | 21 | #3,578 |
| 1977 | 9 | #4,032 | 26 | #3,044 |
| 1976 | 8 | #4,249 | 23 | #3,146 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,111 |
| 1974 | 8 | #4,043 | 20 | #3,376 |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,145 | 23 | #2,966 |
| 1972 | 9 | #3,508 | 11 | #4,958 |
| 1971 | 9 | #3,549 | 29 | #2,572 |
| 1970 | 9 | #3,424 | 25 | #2,822 |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,795 | 19 | #3,154 |
| 1968 | 7 | #3,543 | 27 | #2,391 |
| 1967 | 5 | #4,315 | 36 | #1,967 |
| 1966 | 7 | #3,415 | 41 | #1,782 |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,759 | 33 | #2,048 |
| 1964 | 11 | #2,610 | 34 | #2,058 |
| 1963 | 10 | #2,787 | 39 | #1,885 |
| 1962 | 7 | #3,507 | 44 | #1,721 |
| 1961 | 7 | #3,538 | 28 | #2,277 |
| 1960 | 9 | #2,988 | 30 | #2,129 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,325 | 23 | #2,432 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,541 |
| 1957 | 6 | #3,805 | 13 | #3,407 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,677 |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,884 | 8 | #4,582 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,096 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,377 |
| 1952 | 10 | #2,615 | 9 | #3,985 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,904 |
| 1950 | 6 | #3,529 | 11 | #3,337 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,513 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,063 |
| 1947 | 5 | #4,039 | 7 | #4,571 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,340 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,306 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,462 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,593 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,795 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,041 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,689 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,567 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,833 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 5 | #4,613 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,672 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 5 | #4,680 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,696 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 6 | #4,080 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,525 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Lesly reached #2,610 in 1964. As a girl name, it reached #364 in 2003. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lesly
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.