Is Lilyan a boy or girl name?
Lilyan is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 37 girls and 0 boys were named Lilyan, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 4,304 US babies named Lilyan were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,999
- Babies named Lilyan since 1895
- 4,304
- Most popular year
- 2007
- 194 babies
Boys and girls named Lilyan, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 29 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 164 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 849 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 321 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 162 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 59 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 33 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 122 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,232 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,055 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 235 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,999 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,878 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,194 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,649 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,587 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,253 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,229 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,497 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,336 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,157 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,933 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,543 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,513 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 167 | #1,377 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,462 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 185 | #1,311 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 193 | #1,292 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 194 | #1,269 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,500 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 127 | #1,604 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 123 | #1,597 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 101 | #1,838 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,280 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,682 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,779 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,158 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,490 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,553 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,262 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,844 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,754 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,776 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,660 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,421 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,254 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,611 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,989 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,368 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,972 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,528 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,023 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,461 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,087 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,938 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,186 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,673 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,248 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,040 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,083 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,578 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,262 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,787 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,027 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,604 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,132 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,836 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,332 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,051 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,339 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,508 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,581 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,880 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,549 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,411 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,216 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,058 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,885 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,740 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,525 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,775 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,585 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,416 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,218 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 58 | #980 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 71 | #862 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 77 | #802 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 124 | #641 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 121 | #622 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 123 | #610 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 120 | #595 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 84 | #630 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 63 | #657 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 60 | #643 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 43 | #662 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 34 | #733 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 26 | #806 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 17 | #991 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 28 | #720 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 24 | #753 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,217 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,318 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,058 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,104 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,186 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 17 | #931 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,148 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,222 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,727 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,513 |
Highest rank
Lilyan has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #595 in 1915. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lilyan
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.