Is Luisa a boy or girl name?
Luisa is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 310 girls and 0 boys were named Luisa, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 14,106 US babies named Luisa were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #869
- Babies named Luisa since 1882
- 14,106
- Most popular year
- 2022
- 319 babies
Boys and girls named Luisa, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 149 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 366 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 631 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 364 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 398 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 714 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 973 | 100% |
| 1970s | 12 | 1,130 | 98.9% |
| 1980s | 13 | 1,471 | 99.1% |
| 1990s | 8 | 1,911 | 99.6% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,246 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 2,146 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,423 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 310 | #869 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 276 | #950 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 319 | #871 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 262 | #988 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 256 | #997 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 262 | #985 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 222 | #1,110 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 228 | #1,105 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,186 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 224 | #1,133 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,310 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 205 | #1,175 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,312 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 224 | #1,101 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 209 | #1,163 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 210 | #1,194 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 198 | #1,263 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 230 | #1,127 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 260 | #998 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 226 | #1,059 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 234 | #1,012 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 223 | #1,031 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 236 | #948 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 211 | #1,021 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 218 | #973 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 249 | #865 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 195 | #1,021 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 169 | #1,115 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 189 | #997 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 189 | #996 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 178 | #1,036 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,027 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,005 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 181 | #1,018 |
| 1990 | 8 | #6,189 | 193 | #970 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 180 | #970 |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,520 | 162 | #1,010 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 160 | #984 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,154 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,146 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 171 | #881 |
| 1983 | 5 | #6,902 | 138 | #1,021 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 152 | #975 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,036 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,138 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 147 | #978 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,094 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,158 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 124 | #1,013 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,036 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,319 |
| 1973 | 6 | #4,862 | 111 | #1,049 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,138 |
| 1971 | 6 | #4,721 | 101 | #1,155 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,003 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,116 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,048 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,064 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,006 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 109 | #998 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,139 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,194 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,108 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,088 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,172 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,092 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,148 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,234 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,239 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,173 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,245 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,271 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,206 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,155 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,169 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,150 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,378 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,388 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,369 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,435 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,287 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,572 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,517 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,200 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,285 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,368 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,359 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,321 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,175 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,470 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,250 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,170 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,121 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,085 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 56 | #988 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,115 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 69 | #884 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 73 | #868 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 63 | #948 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,014 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 82 | #826 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 59 | #972 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 59 | #973 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 72 | #873 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 55 | #999 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,084 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 58 | #942 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,094 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,122 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,242 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,053 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,016 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 27 | #993 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 34 | #750 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 24 | #887 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,256 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 22 | #844 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,118 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 16 | #945 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 18 | #889 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 16 | #925 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,110 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 16 | #891 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 13 | #946 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,144 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 12 | #957 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 14 | #946 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 12 | #959 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,026 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,258 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 12 | #927 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,060 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 12 | #885 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,444 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 10 | #912 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,216 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,227 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 9 | #829 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,054 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,000 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 5 | #993 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 8 | #715 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Luisa reached #4,721 in 1971. As a girl name, it reached #715 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Luisa
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.