Is Manda a boy or girl name?
Manda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,294 US babies named Manda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Manda since 1880
- 3,294
- Most popular year
- 1975
- 102 babies
Boys and girls named Manda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 175 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 203 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 197 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 251 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 252 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 126 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 96 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 113 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 125 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 695 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 729 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 249 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 70 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 13 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,882 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,986 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,124 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,810 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,430 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 10 | #11,134 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,546 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,381 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,626 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,657 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,628 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,229 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,017 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,147 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,434 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,596 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,776 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,842 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,012 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,722 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,777 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,160 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,797 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,672 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,531 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,688 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,717 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,684 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,452 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,333 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,595 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,370 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,293 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,253 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,282 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,143 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,679 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,761 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,079 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,050 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,973 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,744 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,134 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,926 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,346 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,695 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,248 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,433 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,296 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,751 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,342 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,866 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,664 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,096 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,003 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,705 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,968 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,766 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,317 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,221 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,844 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,800 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,267 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,908 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,857 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,881 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,350 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,178 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,431 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,245 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,882 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,311 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,916 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,267 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,343 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,521 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,674 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,629 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,199 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,690 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,080 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,984 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,940 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,991 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,423 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,460 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,490 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,445 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,597 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,601 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,605 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,308 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,401 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,459 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,430 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,465 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,325 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,386 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,046 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,216 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 25 | #871 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,340 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 24 | #802 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 18 | #912 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 16 | #947 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 20 | #839 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 22 | #767 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 20 | #779 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 25 | #682 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 19 | #760 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 22 | #792 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 26 | #615 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 21 | #737 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 15 | #853 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 23 | #664 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 20 | #716 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 24 | #602 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 16 | #754 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 23 | #585 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 19 | #619 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 16 | #684 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 17 | #632 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 29 | #464 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 19 | #521 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 19 | #518 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 21 | #464 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 17 | #516 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 18 | #458 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 11 | #588 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 14 | #464 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 10 | #567 |
Highest rank
Manda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #458 in 1883. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Manda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.