Is Maple a boy or girl name?
Maple is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 199 girls and 0 boys were named Maple, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 3,060 US babies named Maple were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,188
- Babies named Maple since 1896
- 3,060
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 199 babies
Boys and girls named Maple, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 67 | 100% |
| 1910s | 5 | 192 | 97.5% |
| 1920s | 0 | 325 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 240 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 231 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 190 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 65 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 747 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 836 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 199 | #1,188 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 188 | #1,240 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 180 | #1,311 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,530 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,598 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,678 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 149 | #1,479 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,066 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,783 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 73 | #2,493 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,172 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,442 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,185 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,003 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,355 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,233 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,975 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,624 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,718 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,181 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,668 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,052 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,947 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,311 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,100 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,839 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,338 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 5 | #13,687 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,467 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,283 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,213 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,970 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,428 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,104 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,837 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,752 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,430 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,422 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,074 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,741 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,665 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,240 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,783 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,605 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,561 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,810 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,743 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,722 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,501 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,995 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,926 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,412 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,002 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,030 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,686 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,573 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,787 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,065 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,394 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,501 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,846 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,058 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,362 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,432 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,630 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,638 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,413 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,844 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,393 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,234 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,414 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,507 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,470 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,335 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,460 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,656 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,199 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,800 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,337 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,228 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,477 |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,341 | 25 | #1,536 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,565 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,826 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,583 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,575 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,458 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,368 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,396 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,133 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,011 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,590 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,507 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,378 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,060 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 14 | #957 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,846 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,855 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,488 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,518 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Maple reached #4,341 in 1917. As a girl name, it reached #957 in 1902. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.