Is Musa a boy or girl name?
Musa is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 566 boys were named Musa, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.6% of the 5,485 US babies named Musa were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #525
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Musa since 1891
- 5,485
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 566 babies
Boys and girls named Musa, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 8 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 18 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1970s | 102 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 160 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 309 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 761 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 2,105 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,017 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 566 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 418 | #653 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 366 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 341 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 326 | #744 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 288 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 317 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 268 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 219 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 228 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 206 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 148 | #1,213 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 168 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 133 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 130 | #1,319 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 114 | #1,464 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 96 | #1,628 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 109 | #1,473 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 102 | #1,497 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 68 | #1,881 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 64 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 57 | #2,022 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 59 | #1,909 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 41 | #2,411 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 51 | #2,007 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 46 | #2,087 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 38 | #2,338 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 32 | #2,534 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 41 | #2,100 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 30 | #2,536 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 24 | #3,004 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 22 | #3,114 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 29 | #2,509 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 28 | #2,519 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 19 | #3,269 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 21 | #2,964 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 19 | #2,922 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 17 | #3,032 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 14 | #3,378 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 10 | #4,243 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 20 | #2,503 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 17 | #2,756 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 18 | #2,666 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 11 | #3,774 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 13 | #3,372 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,113 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,335 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 11 | #3,520 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 11 | #3,406 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 11 | #3,372 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 10 | #3,496 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 12 | #2,968 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 11 | #3,094 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 5 | #5,422 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,216 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,390 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,907 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,530 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,759 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,473 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Musa reached #525 in 2024. As a girl name, it reached #1,473 in 1891. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Musa
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.