Is Nathalie a boy or girl name?
Nathalie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 187 girls and 0 boys were named Nathalie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 20,527 US babies named Nathalie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,244
- Babies named Nathalie since 1881
- 20,527
- Most popular year
- 2009
- 629 babies
Boys and girls named Nathalie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 91 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 136 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 577 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 876 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 510 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 357 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 287 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 530 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 825 | 100% |
| 1980s | 6 | 1,871 | 99.7% |
| 1990s | 0 | 3,821 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 5,034 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,391 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,169 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 187 | #1,244 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 233 | #1,067 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 246 | #1,041 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 216 | #1,140 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 287 | #911 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 298 | #896 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 331 | #820 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 378 | #745 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 436 | #671 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 456 | #627 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 439 | #651 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 529 | #553 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 494 | #590 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 557 | #523 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 473 | #623 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 629 | #489 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 528 | #588 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 525 | #574 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 550 | #540 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 503 | #569 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 438 | #623 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 473 | #583 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 437 | #592 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 497 | #538 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 454 | #573 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 462 | #546 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 581 | #446 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 334 | #659 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 382 | #599 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 357 | #619 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 370 | #607 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 359 | #629 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 332 | #668 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 312 | #687 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 332 | #662 |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,627 | 320 | #646 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 301 | #651 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 232 | #771 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 214 | #788 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 197 | #828 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 195 | #813 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 159 | #936 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,240 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,539 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,669 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,437 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,393 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,651 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,232 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,471 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,222 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,324 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,401 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 87 | #1,277 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,125 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,253 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,205 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,435 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,543 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,362 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,795 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,577 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,013 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,026 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,355 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 32 | #2,008 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,493 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,975 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,436 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,092 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,758 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,915 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,921 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,600 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,948 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,000 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,638 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,714 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,957 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,566 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,357 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,338 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,087 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,113 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,085 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,173 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,108 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,027 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,049 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,217 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 49 | #990 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 60 | #875 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 60 | #912 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 57 | #923 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 74 | #828 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 91 | #733 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 72 | #859 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 74 | #861 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 79 | #828 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 100 | #740 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 83 | #821 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 104 | #716 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 88 | #777 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 109 | #709 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 76 | #829 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 74 | #817 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 86 | #773 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 77 | #790 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 78 | #778 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 75 | #766 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 51 | #824 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 46 | #779 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 37 | #829 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 31 | #786 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 22 | #933 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 18 | #986 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 24 | #803 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 16 | #977 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 15 | #995 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,085 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,225 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,015 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,402 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,297 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,208 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,255 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 16 | #876 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,233 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,272 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,268 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,445 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,069 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,597 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 13 | #778 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 10 | #922 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,004 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 11 | #719 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 9 | #812 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,012 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,122 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 7 | #725 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Nathalie reached #7,627 in 1989. As a girl name, it reached #446 in 1998. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Nathalie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.