Is Odelia a boy or girl name?
Odelia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 56 girls and 0 boys were named Odelia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,803 US babies named Odelia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,952
- Babies named Odelia since 1880
- 2,803
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 56 babies
Boys and girls named Odelia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 68 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 206 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 341 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 343 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 267 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 253 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 223 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 121 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 61 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 75 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 50 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 181 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 283 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 213 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,952 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,626 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,941 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,858 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,892 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 37 | #3,983 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,746 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,130 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,328 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,686 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,942 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,990 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,060 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,094 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,923 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,338 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,509 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,854 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,079 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,727 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,137 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,482 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,724 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,633 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,881 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,646 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,046 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,605 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,909 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,863 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,132 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,538 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 6 | #11,334 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,520 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,480 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,800 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,633 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,854 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,086 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,798 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,786 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,815 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,259 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,153 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,680 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,351 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,025 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,685 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,409 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,563 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,531 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,762 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,224 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,283 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,287 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,730 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,945 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,859 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,651 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,494 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,901 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,367 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,527 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,173 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,916 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,250 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,873 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,511 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,727 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,729 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,812 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,759 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,564 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,732 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,824 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,962 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,524 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,434 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,717 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,689 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,349 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,340 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,407 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,434 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,305 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,372 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,540 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,693 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,512 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,668 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,478 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,703 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,318 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,596 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,424 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,204 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,110 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,113 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,035 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,096 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,076 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,224 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,069 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,093 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,017 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,049 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,160 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 27 | #841 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 28 | #769 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 19 | #933 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 29 | #706 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,032 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 19 | #863 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 21 | #800 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 22 | #727 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 21 | #769 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 16 | #848 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 17 | #936 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 16 | #826 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 14 | #951 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 14 | #888 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 18 | #782 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 12 | #971 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 12 | #939 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,004 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 14 | #826 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,073 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,007 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 11 | #829 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 11 | #720 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 10 | #763 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 10 | #716 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 6 | #894 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 6 | #876 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 6 | #818 |
Highest rank
Odelia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #706 in 1907. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Odelia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.