Is Oswaldo a boy or girl name?
Oswaldo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 43 boys were named Oswaldo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 5,861 US babies named Oswaldo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,930
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Oswaldo since 1915
- 5,861
- Most popular year
- 2006
- 461 babies
Boys and girls named Oswaldo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 13 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 29 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 156 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 234 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 460 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 537 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 978 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 2,454 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 715 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 235 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43 | #2,930 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 44 | #2,878 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 45 | #2,854 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 52 | #2,546 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 51 | #2,533 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 38 | #3,135 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 53 | #2,463 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 48 | #2,621 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 57 | #2,327 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 64 | #2,159 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 83 | #1,810 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 69 | #2,006 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 88 | #1,726 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 95 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 120 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 172 | #1,082 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 208 | #965 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 290 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 461 | #549 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 312 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 269 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 240 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 184 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 191 | #846 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 127 | #1,114 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 135 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 113 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 107 | #1,152 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 112 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 88 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 86 | #1,265 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 92 | #1,167 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 71 | #1,346 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 84 | #1,212 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 90 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 82 | #1,180 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 57 | #1,385 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 50 | #1,456 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 60 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 43 | #1,539 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 39 | #1,571 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 52 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 58 | #1,224 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 38 | #1,593 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 58 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 36 | #1,618 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 54 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 49 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 54 | #1,174 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 51 | #1,188 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 46 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 39 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 53 | #1,126 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 53 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 25 | #1,782 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 29 | #1,519 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 25 | #1,606 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 21 | #1,741 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 23 | #1,643 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 21 | #1,765 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 21 | #1,779 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 20 | #1,821 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 26 | #1,579 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 28 | #1,541 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 20 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 20 | #1,848 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,712 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 15 | #2,166 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 21 | #1,755 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,200 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 21 | #1,693 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 16 | #2,017 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 12 | #2,347 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 10 | #2,616 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 5 | #4,058 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 7 | #3,219 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 7 | #3,236 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 5 | #3,886 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 10 | #2,450 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 5 | #3,844 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,440 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 5 | #4,029 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 9 | #2,949 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,660 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,765 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 6 | #4,197 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 7 | #3,790 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,644 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #3,002 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Oswaldo reached #549 in 2006. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Oswaldo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.