Is Rachell a boy or girl name?
Rachell is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 45 girls and 0 boys were named Rachell, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,946 US babies named Rachell were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,481
- Babies named Rachell since 1915
- 3,946
- Most popular year
- 1982
- 99 babies
Boys and girls named Rachell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 60 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 51 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 182 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 375 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 711 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 886 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 637 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 551 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 294 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 127 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,481 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,023 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,153 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,408 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 14 | #7,861 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,869 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,962 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,780 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,941 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,693 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,998 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,516 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,363 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,542 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,558 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,453 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,634 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,457 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,879 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,781 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,216 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,734 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,700 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,280 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,271 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,303 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,001 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,385 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,661 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,447 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,139 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,109 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,759 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,622 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,021 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 89 | #1,584 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 96 | #1,443 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,563 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,376 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,346 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,529 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 91 | #1,326 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,290 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,470 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,499 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,439 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,417 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,536 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,417 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,556 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,411 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,703 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,412 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,439 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,541 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,435 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,554 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,611 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,441 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,193 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,647 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,239 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,979 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,988 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,358 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,444 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,643 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,151 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,796 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,455 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,676 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,491 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,163 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,292 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,748 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,135 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,845 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,263 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,835 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,102 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,498 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,888 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,240 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,725 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,329 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,680 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,830 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,513 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,841 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,804 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,959 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,111 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,597 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,904 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,366 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,061 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,416 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,790 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,999 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,370 |
Highest rank
Rachell has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,290 in 1982. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rachell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.