Is Reginal a boy or girl name?
Reginal was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 2,594 US babies named Reginal were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #13,747
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Reginal since 1914
- 2,594
- Most popular year
- 1970
- 92 babies
Boys and girls named Reginal, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 26 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 90 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 60 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 110 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 357 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 544 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 606 | 5 | 0.8% |
| 1980s | 379 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 218 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 144 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | #13,747 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 7 | #10,562 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,671 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 7 | #10,485 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 11 | #7,434 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 6 | #11,941 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 10 | #8,005 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 10 | #8,160 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 7 | #10,766 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 12 | #6,984 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 13 | #6,381 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 12 | #6,533 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 13 | #6,065 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 17 | #4,771 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 19 | #4,293 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 23 | #3,699 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 18 | #4,340 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 17 | #4,297 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,818 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,561 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 20 | #3,527 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 14 | #4,456 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 25 | #2,924 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 18 | #3,618 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 25 | #2,807 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 25 | #2,736 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 35 | #2,117 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 42 | #1,824 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 26 | #2,345 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 32 | #1,968 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 38 | #1,687 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 34 | #1,783 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 33 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 32 | #1,783 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 43 | #1,481 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 56 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 43 | #1,466 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 50 | #1,313 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 51 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 52 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 58 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 43 | #1,339 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 66 | #1,014 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 60 | #1,053 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 65 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 69 | #983 | 5 | #9,272 |
| 1970 | 92 | #844 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 71 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 65 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 67 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 57 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 58 | #974 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 41 | #1,213 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 48 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 35 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 52 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 50 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 41 | #1,224 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 40 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 46 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 41 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 36 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 34 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 39 | #1,209 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 25 | #1,543 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 34 | #1,275 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 21 | #1,645 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 13 | #2,200 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 13 | #2,198 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 17 | #1,899 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 8 | #2,860 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,943 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 11 | #2,280 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 13 | #2,163 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 9 | #2,674 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 8 | #2,835 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 11 | #2,289 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,446 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 8 | #2,808 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 5 | #4,043 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 5 | #4,107 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 8 | #2,943 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 9 | #2,800 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 8 | #3,045 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 7 | #3,524 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 7 | #3,487 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 14 | #2,244 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 8 | #3,386 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 10 | #2,869 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 10 | #2,896 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 7 | #3,787 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 8 | #3,402 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 9 | #3,195 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 7 | #3,800 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 10 | #2,923 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 10 | #2,828 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,677 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,891 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,653 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Reginal reached #844 in 1970. As a girl name, it reached #9,272 in 1971. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Reginal
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.