Is Richmond a boy or girl name?
Richmond is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 13 boys were named Richmond, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 4,287 US babies named Richmond were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,722
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Richmond since 1880
- 4,287
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 73 babies
Boys and girls named Richmond, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 98 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 116 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 123 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 394 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 533 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 390 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 397 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 403 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 322 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 334 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 276 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 339 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 245 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 88 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | #6,722 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 13 | #6,811 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 15 | #6,081 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 28 | #3,892 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 19 | #4,991 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 20 | #4,928 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 26 | #4,081 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 23 | #4,432 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 24 | #4,287 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 24 | #4,264 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 26 | #3,986 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 17 | #5,347 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 26 | #3,982 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 23 | #4,326 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 20 | #4,803 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 23 | #4,395 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 21 | #4,671 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 17 | #5,387 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 21 | #4,473 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 28 | #3,510 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 27 | #3,522 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 28 | #3,348 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 24 | #3,645 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 26 | #3,390 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 30 | #2,978 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 25 | #3,260 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 31 | #2,696 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 21 | #3,432 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 33 | #2,422 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 25 | #2,908 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 27 | #2,742 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 41 | #1,995 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 49 | #1,745 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 39 | #1,975 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 48 | #1,697 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 26 | #2,529 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 29 | #2,184 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 29 | #2,104 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 29 | #2,045 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 26 | #2,163 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 27 | #2,023 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 29 | #1,896 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 28 | #1,981 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 31 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 22 | #2,348 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 32 | #1,778 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 24 | #2,056 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 26 | #1,938 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 37 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 30 | #1,652 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 32 | #1,541 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 45 | #1,246 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 35 | #1,460 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 48 | #1,204 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 37 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 35 | #1,309 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 47 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 25 | #1,570 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 28 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 29 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 29 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 35 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 25 | #1,625 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 32 | #1,427 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 37 | #1,295 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 38 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 43 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 39 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 38 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 36 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 42 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 37 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 52 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 41 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 38 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 40 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 47 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 47 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 37 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 38 | #1,082 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 42 | #1,049 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 35 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 33 | #1,166 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 40 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 44 | #952 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 41 | #1,003 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 33 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 34 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 37 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 31 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 37 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 39 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 43 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 51 | #955 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 48 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 50 | #974 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 45 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 66 | #819 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 49 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 56 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 58 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 53 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 73 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 35 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 52 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 47 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 46 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 59 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 54 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 33 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 39 | #756 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 28 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 20 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 16 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 17 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 16 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 18 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 10 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 16 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 10 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 15 | #675 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 19 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 18 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 11 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 10 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 10 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 9 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 16 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 9 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 9 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 5 | #1,128 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 9 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 10 | #689 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 13 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 8 | #745 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 9 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 11 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 13 | #515 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 11 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 8 | #733 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Richmond reached #433 in 1899. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Richmond
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.