Is Rodolfo a boy or girl name?
Rodolfo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 124 boys were named Rodolfo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 33,733 US babies named Rodolfo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,459
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rodolfo since 1902
- 33,733
- Most popular year
- 1981
- 610 babies
Boys and girls named Rodolfo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 40 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 359 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,507 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,433 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 1,853 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 3,031 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 3,100 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 4,053 | 16 | 0.4% |
| 1980s | 5,177 | 47 | 0.9% |
| 1990s | 5,665 | 20 | 0.4% |
| 2000s | 4,594 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 2,166 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 672 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 124 | #1,459 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 130 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 138 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 138 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 142 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 155 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 183 | #1,084 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 172 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 195 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 228 | #931 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 225 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 228 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 221 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 258 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 301 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 303 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 355 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 426 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 497 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 497 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 489 | #500 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 494 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 452 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 494 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 587 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 571 | #413 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 579 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 508 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 546 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 540 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 599 | #388 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 580 | #398 | 7 | #11,498 |
| 1992 | 593 | #387 | 7 | #11,419 |
| 1991 | 574 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 575 | #401 | 6 | #12,545 |
| 1989 | 559 | #393 | 5 | #13,979 |
| 1988 | 438 | #430 | 8 | #9,034 |
| 1987 | 507 | #379 | 7 | #9,558 |
| 1986 | 560 | #344 | 8 | #8,310 |
| 1985 | 470 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 443 | #388 | 5 | #11,723 |
| 1983 | 475 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 552 | #342 | 5 | #11,855 |
| 1981 | 610 | #311 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 563 | #333 | 9 | #7,248 |
| 1979 | 443 | #384 | 5 | #11,480 |
| 1978 | 431 | #372 | 6 | #9,437 |
| 1977 | 414 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 427 | #371 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 451 | #367 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 384 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 374 | #404 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 385 | #400 | 5 | #9,280 |
| 1971 | 351 | #435 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 393 | #412 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 281 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 316 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 331 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 311 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 318 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 322 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 282 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 319 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 302 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 318 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 296 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 304 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 299 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 285 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 297 | #427 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 342 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 341 | #372 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 303 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 299 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 265 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 250 | #429 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 228 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 212 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 233 | #417 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 200 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 162 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 171 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 144 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 131 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 122 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 126 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 120 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 115 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 131 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 145 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 148 | #464 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 137 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 145 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 163 | #441 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 203 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 207 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 226 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 218 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 182 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 173 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 126 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 118 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 93 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 91 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 73 | #782 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 67 | #797 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 53 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 54 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 40 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 45 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 30 | #1,047 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 31 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 19 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,271 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 5 | #1,648 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,345 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 8 | #1,075 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 9 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 7 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rodolfo reached #311 in 1981. As a girl name, it reached #7,248 in 1980. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rodolfo
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.